Condom users find baggy design an improvement over the standard version.

D. Hollander
{"title":"Condom users find baggy design an improvement over the standard version.","authors":"D. Hollander","doi":"10.2307/2648185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes the findings of a randomized crossover study comparing a new loose-fitting male latex condom and a straight shaft condom in terms of rates of breakage and slippage. A total of 102 couples were randomly assigned to use one type of condom and then the other (5 condoms of each type) and were given a questionnaire obtaining detailed information about their experience with each use and a follow-up interview was conducted. Results showed that the baggy condom and the standard straight-shaft condom have similar rates of breakage and slippage. However participants said that the baggy condom which creates more friction for both partners makes sex more enjoyable feels more natural during intercourse is easier to keep on during sex and is not as disruptive during intercourse as the standard version. Since many couples are reluctant to use the standard straight-shaft condoms or do not use them consistently because they reduce pleasure during intercourse the development of a more acceptable version could be a key factor in increasing the use of the method.","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"32 1","pages":"260-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2648185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2648185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper summarizes the findings of a randomized crossover study comparing a new loose-fitting male latex condom and a straight shaft condom in terms of rates of breakage and slippage. A total of 102 couples were randomly assigned to use one type of condom and then the other (5 condoms of each type) and were given a questionnaire obtaining detailed information about their experience with each use and a follow-up interview was conducted. Results showed that the baggy condom and the standard straight-shaft condom have similar rates of breakage and slippage. However participants said that the baggy condom which creates more friction for both partners makes sex more enjoyable feels more natural during intercourse is easier to keep on during sex and is not as disruptive during intercourse as the standard version. Since many couples are reluctant to use the standard straight-shaft condoms or do not use them consistently because they reduce pleasure during intercourse the development of a more acceptable version could be a key factor in increasing the use of the method.
避孕套使用者发现宽松的设计比标准版本有了改进。
本文总结了一项随机交叉研究的结果,比较了一种新的宽松的男性乳胶避孕套和一种直轴避孕套的破裂率和滑脱率。总共102对夫妇被随机分配使用一种类型的安全套,然后使用另一种类型(每种类型5个安全套),并获得一份调查问卷,了解他们每次使用的详细信息,并进行了随访访谈。结果表明,宽松套套与标准直轴套套的破损率和打滑率相似。然而,参与者表示,宽松的避孕套会给双方带来更多摩擦,使性爱更愉快,在性交过程中感觉更自然,在性交过程中更容易保持,并且不会像标准版本那样干扰性交。由于许多夫妇不愿意使用标准的直轴避孕套,或者因为它们降低了性交时的快感而不一直使用它们,因此开发一种更容易被接受的版本可能是增加这种方法使用的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信