The International Patent Propensity Divide

D. Benoliel
{"title":"The International Patent Propensity Divide","authors":"D. Benoliel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3504110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article contributes conceptually and empirically towards an innovation-based growth theory for developing countries. The proposed theory adheres to the growing importance given by theoreticians and policy makers alike to re-visiting the neoclassical economics “one size fits all” innovation policy propagated by current international intellectual property instruments. \n \nIn arguing for an innovation-based growth theory, the Article offers a unique statistical country panel data model for comparing patent propensity rates as a proxy for national innovation over sixteen years (1996–2011) between two groups of countries straddling the developing-developed countries divide: “Emerging Economies” and “Advanced Economies.” The International Monetary Fund has labeled certain developing countries as “Emerging Economies,” which are hotbeds of meaningful innovation within the developing world, and others as “Advanced Economies,” which includes most of the countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.","PeriodicalId":90661,"journal":{"name":"North Carolina journal of law & technology","volume":"15 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Carolina journal of law & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This Article contributes conceptually and empirically towards an innovation-based growth theory for developing countries. The proposed theory adheres to the growing importance given by theoreticians and policy makers alike to re-visiting the neoclassical economics “one size fits all” innovation policy propagated by current international intellectual property instruments. In arguing for an innovation-based growth theory, the Article offers a unique statistical country panel data model for comparing patent propensity rates as a proxy for national innovation over sixteen years (1996–2011) between two groups of countries straddling the developing-developed countries divide: “Emerging Economies” and “Advanced Economies.” The International Monetary Fund has labeled certain developing countries as “Emerging Economies,” which are hotbeds of meaningful innovation within the developing world, and others as “Advanced Economies,” which includes most of the countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
国际专利倾向差异
本文在概念和实证上为发展中国家的创新增长理论做出了贡献。提出的理论符合理论家和政策制定者对重新审视当前国际知识产权文书所宣传的新古典经济学“一刀切”创新政策的日益重视。在论证基于创新的增长理论时,本文提供了一个独特的统计国家面板数据模型,用于比较16年来(1996-2011年)跨越发展中发达国家鸿沟的两组国家:“新兴经济体”和“发达经济体”之间的专利倾向率作为国家创新的代表。国际货币基金组织将一些发展中国家称为“新兴经济体”,这些国家是发展中国家内部有意义的创新的温床,而其他发展中国家则被称为“发达经济体”,其中包括经济合作与发展组织的大多数国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信