Of Constitutional Amendments, Human Rights, and Same-Sex Marriages

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Medina
{"title":"Of Constitutional Amendments, Human Rights, and Same-Sex Marriages","authors":"M. Medina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3344582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author explores the role of amendments in the constitutional scheme and the role of the U.S. constitution as the guarantor in the United States of basic human rights. The author contends that constitutional amendments should not be used to perpetuate tyranny and deny certain human beings the exercise of basic human rights. Whether viewed as preservation of a basic human right to pursue happiness through marriage or to be free from societal animus because of one’s sexual orientation, it is difficult to justify prohibitions against same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriages involve protected conduct, a highly valued institution and relationships that cause no harm or injury to individuals or society at large.","PeriodicalId":39678,"journal":{"name":"Louisiana Law Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louisiana Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3344582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The author explores the role of amendments in the constitutional scheme and the role of the U.S. constitution as the guarantor in the United States of basic human rights. The author contends that constitutional amendments should not be used to perpetuate tyranny and deny certain human beings the exercise of basic human rights. Whether viewed as preservation of a basic human right to pursue happiness through marriage or to be free from societal animus because of one’s sexual orientation, it is difficult to justify prohibitions against same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriages involve protected conduct, a highly valued institution and relationships that cause no harm or injury to individuals or society at large.
宪法修正案,人权和同性婚姻
作者探讨了修正案在宪法制度中的作用,以及美国宪法作为美国基本人权保障的作用。发件人认为,不应利用宪法修正案使暴政永久化,并剥夺某些人行使基本人权的权利。无论是被视为通过婚姻追求幸福的基本人权,还是被视为免于因性取向而受到社会敌意的基本人权,禁止同性婚姻都很难站得住立场。同性婚姻涉及受保护的行为,高度重视的制度和关系,不会对个人或整个社会造成伤害或伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Louisiana Law Review
Louisiana Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Louisiana Law Review went into print in November of 1938. Since then the Review has served as Louisiana"s flagship legal journal and has become a vibrant forum for scholarship in comparative and civil law topics. The article below is taken from the first issue of the Law Review. The piece was meant to commemorate the founding of the Law Review and to foreshadow the lasting impact that the Louisiana Law Review would have on state jurisprudence and legislation and on the legal landscape of Louisiana for years to come.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信