The effects of extraction technique on phenolic compounds extracted from fig (Ficuscarica) pulp andskin

E. Maghsoudlou
{"title":"The effects of extraction technique on phenolic compounds extracted from fig (Ficuscarica) pulp andskin","authors":"E. Maghsoudlou","doi":"10.22067/IFSTRJ.V1394I6.51760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Subcritical Water Extraction (SWE) has been well known as a green technology for extraction of bioactive compounds from plants. In this study, Subcritical water extraction, ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) and shaker solvent extraction (SSE) were compared for extraction of phenolic compounds from fig (Ficuscarica) pulp and skin. Antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated using DPPH radical scavenging, reducing power and rancimat tests. Subcritical waterhad the highest ability for extraction of total phenolic content (65.89±0.21 and 80.79±0.09 mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of extract respectively) and flavonoid compounds (7.51±0.33 and 10.1±1.02 mg of quercetinequivalents per gram of extract, respectively)from both pulp and skin.The lowest IC50 in DPPH radical scavenging and reducing power tests were related to SWE of skin extract of fig. Furthermore, in extraction of total phenol and flavonoid compounds, subcritical water extraction showed to be a more suitable method than other solvent extraction methods, both in pulp and skin.","PeriodicalId":52634,"journal":{"name":"mjlh pjwhshhy `lwm w Sny` Gdhyy yrn","volume":"11 1","pages":"758-769"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjlh pjwhshhy `lwm w Sny` Gdhyy yrn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22067/IFSTRJ.V1394I6.51760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recently, Subcritical Water Extraction (SWE) has been well known as a green technology for extraction of bioactive compounds from plants. In this study, Subcritical water extraction, ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) and shaker solvent extraction (SSE) were compared for extraction of phenolic compounds from fig (Ficuscarica) pulp and skin. Antioxidant activity of the extracts was evaluated using DPPH radical scavenging, reducing power and rancimat tests. Subcritical waterhad the highest ability for extraction of total phenolic content (65.89±0.21 and 80.79±0.09 mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of extract respectively) and flavonoid compounds (7.51±0.33 and 10.1±1.02 mg of quercetinequivalents per gram of extract, respectively)from both pulp and skin.The lowest IC50 in DPPH radical scavenging and reducing power tests were related to SWE of skin extract of fig. Furthermore, in extraction of total phenol and flavonoid compounds, subcritical water extraction showed to be a more suitable method than other solvent extraction methods, both in pulp and skin.
提取工艺对无花果果肉和果皮中酚类化合物的影响
近年来,亚临界水萃取(SWE)作为一种从植物中提取生物活性物质的绿色技术而受到广泛关注。比较了亚临界水萃取法、超声辅助萃取法和振动溶剂萃取法对无花果果肉和果皮中酚类化合物的提取效果。通过DPPH自由基清除能力、还原能力和环境实验来评价提取物的抗氧化活性。亚临界水对果肉和果皮中总酚含量(每克提取物中没食子酸当量分别为65.89±0.21和80.79±0.09 mg)和类黄酮含量(每克提取物中槲皮酸当量分别为7.51±0.33和10.1±1.02 mg)的提取率最高。最低的IC50 DPPH自由基清除和还原能力测试是瑞典文的皮肤中提取无花果。此外,在总酚和类黄酮化合物的提取、亚临界水萃取显示是一个更合适的方法比其他溶剂萃取方法,在纸浆和皮肤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书