On Que(e)rying Feminism: Reclaiming the F Word

Q3 Social Sciences
B. Hernández-Truyol
{"title":"On Que(e)rying Feminism: Reclaiming the F Word","authors":"B. Hernández-Truyol","doi":"10.2202/1539-8323.1137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I’d like to rethink the erasure of the word “feminism.” To begin that reconsideration I provide a brief journey through the development of feminisms, discussing the “waves” and outlining the development/evolution of feminism. Next I articulate three reasons why the F word has faded, followed by a “Reality Check”—facts about the real condition of real women’s lives which scream for the ongoing centrality of feminisms. The essay concludes with my vision for a future in which feminist ideas improve everyone’s lives.","PeriodicalId":34921,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1539-8323.1137","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this essay, I’d like to rethink the erasure of the word “feminism.” To begin that reconsideration I provide a brief journey through the development of feminisms, discussing the “waves” and outlining the development/evolution of feminism. Next I articulate three reasons why the F word has faded, followed by a “Reality Check”—facts about the real condition of real women’s lives which scream for the ongoing centrality of feminisms. The essay concludes with my vision for a future in which feminist ideas improve everyone’s lives.
论运动中的女权主义:重拾F字
在这篇文章中,我想重新思考“女权主义”这个词的抹去。为了开始重新思考,我提供了一个关于女权主义发展的简短旅程,讨论“浪潮”并概述女权主义的发展/演变。接下来,我阐述了“F”这个词消失的三个原因,然后是“现实检查”——关于真实女性生活的真实状况的事实,这些事实为女权主义的持续中心地位而呐喊。这篇文章的结尾是我对未来的展望,在未来,女权主义思想将改善每个人的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Legal Scholarship
Issues in Legal Scholarship Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues in Legal Scholarship presents cutting-edge legal and policy research using the format of online peer-reviewed symposia. The journal’s emphasis on interdisciplinary work and legal theory extends to recent symposium topics such as Single-Sex Marriage, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, and Catastrophic Risks. The symposia systematically address emerging issues of great significance, offering ongoing scholarship of interest to a wide range of policy and legal researchers. Online publication makes it possible for other researchers to find the best and latest quickly, as well as to join in further discussion. Each symposium aims to be a living forum with ongoing publications and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信