Ethnic differences in beliefs about control.

Sociometry Pub Date : 1975-06-01 DOI:10.2307/2786604
D. Kinder, L. Reeder
{"title":"Ethnic differences in beliefs about control.","authors":"D. Kinder, L. Reeder","doi":"10.2307/2786604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A set of widely used measures of personal control taken from Rotter's (1966) internal-external scale failed to demonstrate an adequate degree of internal consistency for the Black subsample of a survey of the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The unreliability of the personal control dimension among Blacks was pervasive: it was present within tall ge and educational groupings; it occurred regardless of the particular interviewer involved; it was equally prominent in both sexes; and, finally, it recurred in most respects in a comparable survey. Such unreliability was specific to Blacks: the personal control dimension did show satisfactory internal consistency for corresponding subsamples of Anglos and Chlcanos. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed, and their ramifications for social indicator research noted.","PeriodicalId":76949,"journal":{"name":"Sociometry","volume":"38 2 1","pages":"261-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2786604","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2786604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

A set of widely used measures of personal control taken from Rotter's (1966) internal-external scale failed to demonstrate an adequate degree of internal consistency for the Black subsample of a survey of the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The unreliability of the personal control dimension among Blacks was pervasive: it was present within tall ge and educational groupings; it occurred regardless of the particular interviewer involved; it was equally prominent in both sexes; and, finally, it recurred in most respects in a comparable survey. Such unreliability was specific to Blacks: the personal control dimension did show satisfactory internal consistency for corresponding subsamples of Anglos and Chlcanos. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed, and their ramifications for social indicator research noted.
种族对控制观念的差异。
从Rotter(1966)的内部-外部量表中获得的一套广泛使用的个人控制措施未能证明洛杉矶大都市区调查的黑人子样本具有足够程度的内部一致性。黑人个人控制维度的不可靠性是普遍存在的:它存在于身高和教育程度的群体中;它的发生与特定的采访者无关;这在两性中同样突出;最后,在一项可比较的调查中,它在大多数方面都出现了。这种不可靠性是黑人特有的:个人控制维度在盎格鲁人和火山人的相应子样本中确实表现出令人满意的内部一致性。讨论了这些发现的理论和方法意义,并指出了它们对社会指标研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信