{"title":"An empirical study of the relationships of Catholic practice and occupational mobility to fertility.","authors":"H. Brooks, F. Henry","doi":"10.2307/3348555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MPIRICAL research in differential fertility as in other areas operates with two general types of independent variables: hypotheses variables and control variables. Interest is focused on the relationship of the hypothesis variable and the dependent variable, but a careful testing of the hypothesis demands that the influence of other relevant factors, the control variables, be eliminated or held constant. These variables have their origin in deductive theory and/or in empirical fact. Deductive theory usually contributes more heavily to hypotheses variables; empirical generalizations to control variables. Accordingly, this section presents a brief review of some of the literature on differential fertility as a source of control variables. Four topics are considered: the Catholic-non-Catholic fertility differential within the United States, the declining importance of this differential, fertility differentials within the Catholic population, and finally, fertility differentials within the general American population. The Catholic-non-Catholic Differential. In an early correlational analysis of the relationship of religion and fertility, Hornell Hart concluded from a study in Iowa that the \"tendency for married Catholics to have more children than married non-Catholics is offset by the fact that Catholics in Iowa","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"36 3 1","pages":"222-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3348555","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3348555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
MPIRICAL research in differential fertility as in other areas operates with two general types of independent variables: hypotheses variables and control variables. Interest is focused on the relationship of the hypothesis variable and the dependent variable, but a careful testing of the hypothesis demands that the influence of other relevant factors, the control variables, be eliminated or held constant. These variables have their origin in deductive theory and/or in empirical fact. Deductive theory usually contributes more heavily to hypotheses variables; empirical generalizations to control variables. Accordingly, this section presents a brief review of some of the literature on differential fertility as a source of control variables. Four topics are considered: the Catholic-non-Catholic fertility differential within the United States, the declining importance of this differential, fertility differentials within the Catholic population, and finally, fertility differentials within the general American population. The Catholic-non-Catholic Differential. In an early correlational analysis of the relationship of religion and fertility, Hornell Hart concluded from a study in Iowa that the "tendency for married Catholics to have more children than married non-Catholics is offset by the fact that Catholics in Iowa