An empirical study of the relationships of Catholic practice and occupational mobility to fertility.

H. Brooks, F. Henry
{"title":"An empirical study of the relationships of Catholic practice and occupational mobility to fertility.","authors":"H. Brooks, F. Henry","doi":"10.2307/3348555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MPIRICAL research in differential fertility as in other areas operates with two general types of independent variables: hypotheses variables and control variables. Interest is focused on the relationship of the hypothesis variable and the dependent variable, but a careful testing of the hypothesis demands that the influence of other relevant factors, the control variables, be eliminated or held constant. These variables have their origin in deductive theory and/or in empirical fact. Deductive theory usually contributes more heavily to hypotheses variables; empirical generalizations to control variables. Accordingly, this section presents a brief review of some of the literature on differential fertility as a source of control variables. Four topics are considered: the Catholic-non-Catholic fertility differential within the United States, the declining importance of this differential, fertility differentials within the Catholic population, and finally, fertility differentials within the general American population. The Catholic-non-Catholic Differential. In an early correlational analysis of the relationship of religion and fertility, Hornell Hart concluded from a study in Iowa that the \"tendency for married Catholics to have more children than married non-Catholics is offset by the fact that Catholics in Iowa","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"36 3 1","pages":"222-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3348555","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3348555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

MPIRICAL research in differential fertility as in other areas operates with two general types of independent variables: hypotheses variables and control variables. Interest is focused on the relationship of the hypothesis variable and the dependent variable, but a careful testing of the hypothesis demands that the influence of other relevant factors, the control variables, be eliminated or held constant. These variables have their origin in deductive theory and/or in empirical fact. Deductive theory usually contributes more heavily to hypotheses variables; empirical generalizations to control variables. Accordingly, this section presents a brief review of some of the literature on differential fertility as a source of control variables. Four topics are considered: the Catholic-non-Catholic fertility differential within the United States, the declining importance of this differential, fertility differentials within the Catholic population, and finally, fertility differentials within the general American population. The Catholic-non-Catholic Differential. In an early correlational analysis of the relationship of religion and fertility, Hornell Hart concluded from a study in Iowa that the "tendency for married Catholics to have more children than married non-Catholics is offset by the fact that Catholics in Iowa
天主教实践和职业流动与生育关系的实证研究。
与其他领域一样,差别生育力的实证研究使用两种一般类型的独立变量:假设变量和控制变量。兴趣集中在假设变量和因变量的关系上,但对假设的仔细检验要求消除其他相关因素(控制变量)的影响或保持不变。这些变量源于演绎理论和/或经验事实。演绎理论通常对假设变量贡献更大;控制变量的经验概括。因此,本节将简要回顾一些关于作为控制变量来源的差异生育率的文献。研究考虑了四个主题:美国境内天主教徒和非天主教徒的生育率差异,这种差异的重要性下降,天主教徒人口中的生育率差异,最后,美国总人口中的生育率差异。天主教徒与非天主教徒的差别。霍内尔·哈特(Hornell Hart)从爱荷华州的一项研究中得出结论,在早期对宗教与生育率关系的相关分析中,“已婚天主教徒比已婚非天主教徒生育更多孩子的趋势被爱荷华州天主教徒生育更多孩子的事实所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信