VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE UNTUK SKRINING DISTRES PSIKOLOGIK DAN DISFUNGSI SOSIAL DI MASYARAKAT

IF 0.1
Sri Idaiani, S. Suhardi
{"title":"VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE UNTUK SKRINING DISTRES PSIKOLOGIK DAN DISFUNGSI SOSIAL DI MASYARAKAT","authors":"Sri Idaiani, S. Suhardi","doi":"10.22435/BPK.V34I4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every mental health intervention program needv a screening tool which is valid and reliable for mental health cases in their own community. The main objectives of the study were to measure the validity and reliability of the 12 items of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and to determine the optimum cut off scores. The study site was located in Abadi Jaya Sub-district, Depok City, West Jawa. Four hundred subjects were selected randomly by the Kish method to participate in the study. The results of the GHQ-12 interviews were then compared with the Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90) scores as the gold standard. Retest for reliability assessments were followed by 89 out of the 400 subjects and administered in 2-3 week intervals. The optimum cut-off scores of the GHQ-12 was 7/8 with a sensitivity of 67.80 and a specificity of 74.75. The Alpha Cronbach ranged from 0.670-0.776. There were no significant differences between the first and second GHQ-12 scores (Z= -0.211, P=0.833). The GHQ-12 with moderate validity and high reliability has the potential to become a screening tool, and accordingly needs to he tailored and developed furthermore.","PeriodicalId":41475,"journal":{"name":"Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22435/BPK.V34I4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Every mental health intervention program needv a screening tool which is valid and reliable for mental health cases in their own community. The main objectives of the study were to measure the validity and reliability of the 12 items of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and to determine the optimum cut off scores. The study site was located in Abadi Jaya Sub-district, Depok City, West Jawa. Four hundred subjects were selected randomly by the Kish method to participate in the study. The results of the GHQ-12 interviews were then compared with the Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90) scores as the gold standard. Retest for reliability assessments were followed by 89 out of the 400 subjects and administered in 2-3 week intervals. The optimum cut-off scores of the GHQ-12 was 7/8 with a sensitivity of 67.80 and a specificity of 74.75. The Alpha Cronbach ranged from 0.670-0.776. There were no significant differences between the first and second GHQ-12 scores (Z= -0.211, P=0.833). The GHQ-12 with moderate validity and high reliability has the potential to become a screening tool, and accordingly needs to he tailored and developed furthermore.
社会心理压力检查和社会功能障碍的一般健康问题的有效性和可靠性
每一个心理健康干预项目都需要一个对其所在社区的心理健康病例有效可靠的筛查工具。本研究的主要目的是测量一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)中12个项目的效度和信度,并确定最佳分值。研究地点位于西爪哇Depok市Abadi Jaya街道。采用Kish方法随机选取400名受试者参与研究。然后将GHQ-12访谈结果与症状检查表90 (SCL-90)得分作为金标准进行比较。对400名受试者中的89名进行了可靠性评估的重新测试,并以2-3周的间隔进行了测试。GHQ-12的最佳分值为7/8,敏感性为67.80,特异性为74.75。Alpha Cronbach在0.670-0.776之间。第一次和第二次GHQ-12评分差异无统计学意义(Z= -0.211, P=0.833)。GHQ-12具有中等效度和高信度的特点,具有成为一种筛选工具的潜力,需要进一步进行定制和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan
Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信