한국표준 일반용 이음절어표를 사용한 어음인지역치의 검사-재검사 신뢰도

진소영, 이정학
{"title":"한국표준 일반용 이음절어표를 사용한 어음인지역치의 검사-재검사 신뢰도","authors":"진소영, 이정학","doi":"10.21848/AUDIOL.2015.11.2.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability of speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) \nmeasured by Korean standard bisyllabic word list for adults (KS-BWL-A). Thirteen normal-hearing adults (14 ears) \nand 67 hearing-impaired persons (93 ears) with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) participated in this study. Subjects \nwith SNHL were categorized into four groups: 1) mild hearing loss, 2) moderate hearing loss, 3) moderately severe \nhearing loss, and 4) severe-to-profound hearing loss. Pure tone audiometry and the SRT test with KS-BWL-A were \nadministered in all participants. The SRTs were mathematically calculated based on the national and international \nstandards (ISO 8253-3, 2012; KS I ISO 8253-3, 2009). The retest of the SRTs was performed within two weeks \nwith the same procedure as the initial test. Results showed that the first SRTs were highly correlated with the \nsecond SRTs for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups. There was no significant difference between the first \nand second SRTs for normal-hearing group. For hearing impaired groups, the second SRTs were slightly decreased \nthan the initial SRTs in all four groups. The 95% confidence intervals for each group were between ± .82 ~ ±1.44 \ndB and the 95% prediction intervals of individual scores for each group were between ±3.10 ~ ±4.34 dB. Results \nrecommend that SRT test using the KS-BWL-A be a reliable method in every category of SNHL as well as \nnormal-hearing based on high correlation, narrow CI and PI. It is also suggested that a difference greater than 5 dB \nbetween the first and second SRTs be interpreted as significant in clinical situations.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"20 1","pages":"156-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/AUDIOL.2015.11.2.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability of speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) measured by Korean standard bisyllabic word list for adults (KS-BWL-A). Thirteen normal-hearing adults (14 ears) and 67 hearing-impaired persons (93 ears) with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) participated in this study. Subjects with SNHL were categorized into four groups: 1) mild hearing loss, 2) moderate hearing loss, 3) moderately severe hearing loss, and 4) severe-to-profound hearing loss. Pure tone audiometry and the SRT test with KS-BWL-A were administered in all participants. The SRTs were mathematically calculated based on the national and international standards (ISO 8253-3, 2012; KS I ISO 8253-3, 2009). The retest of the SRTs was performed within two weeks with the same procedure as the initial test. Results showed that the first SRTs were highly correlated with the second SRTs for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups. There was no significant difference between the first and second SRTs for normal-hearing group. For hearing impaired groups, the second SRTs were slightly decreased than the initial SRTs in all four groups. The 95% confidence intervals for each group were between ± .82 ~ ±1.44 dB and the 95% prediction intervals of individual scores for each group were between ±3.10 ~ ±4.34 dB. Results recommend that SRT test using the KS-BWL-A be a reliable method in every category of SNHL as well as normal-hearing based on high correlation, narrow CI and PI. It is also suggested that a difference greater than 5 dB between the first and second SRTs be interpreted as significant in clinical situations.
使用韩国标准一般用二音节词表的票据认知值检查-复检信赖度
摘要本研究旨在探讨成人韩语标准双音节词表(KS-BWL-A)所测语音识别阈值的重测信度。13名正常听力成人(14耳)和67名感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的听障人士(93耳)参加了本研究。SNHL患者被分为四组:1)轻度听力损失,2)中度听力损失,3)中重度听力损失,4)重度至重度听力损失。对所有受试者进行纯音听力测定和KS-BWL-A的SRT测试。根据国家和国际标准(ISO 8253-3, 2012;iso 8253-3, 2009)。在两周内按照与初始测试相同的程序进行srt的重新测试。结果显示,听力正常组和听力受损组的第一次听力测试与第二次听力测试高度相关。听力正常组第一次和第二次srt无显著差异。对于听力受损组,所有四组的第二次srt均略低于首次srt。各组评分的95%置信区间为±0.82 ~±1.44 dB,各组评分的95%预测区间为±3.10 ~±4.34 dB。结果表明,KS-BWL-A的SRT检测具有高相关性、窄CI和PI的特点,是一种可靠的方法,适用于各类SNHL和正常听力。研究还表明,在临床情况下,第一次和第二次srt之间的差异大于5 dB可被解释为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信