Study on the Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) in Patientswith Tinnitus and Hearing Loss and Association withSelf-reported Subjective Questionnaire

Ji In Yeon, J. Byun, M. Park, J. Lee
{"title":"Study on the Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) in Patientswith Tinnitus and Hearing Loss and Association withSelf-reported Subjective Questionnaire","authors":"Ji In Yeon, J. Byun, M. Park, J. Lee","doi":"10.21848/audiol.2015.11.2.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to identify whether subjects with tinnitus and hearing loss would tolerate noise poorly than subjects only with hearing loss. This study also evaluated whether the acceptable noise level (ANL) of listeners with tinnitus would be associated with results of self-reported subjective questionnaire. An experimental group (12 subjects with tinnitus and hearing loss) was compared to non-tinnitus control group (11 subjects with hearing loss), whose audiometric thresholds were statistically similar between two groups. Individual ANLs were measured across five types of background noise (1-male, 1-female, 2-talker, 4-talker, and 8-talker maskers). The self-reported subjective questionnaire evaluated individual subjective handicap of tinnitus and relevant depression. Results showed that the experimental group had relatively more annoyance from noise (higher ANLs) compared to control group, regardless of the type of background noise. From the results of subjective questionnaires, we found that listeners who reported more handicap of tinnitus had less tolerance of background noise (higher ANLs). In conclusion, tinnitus may affect subjective capacity to accept background noise while following a target story, and it can be related with subjective handicap from tinnitus.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/audiol.2015.11.2.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify whether subjects with tinnitus and hearing loss would tolerate noise poorly than subjects only with hearing loss. This study also evaluated whether the acceptable noise level (ANL) of listeners with tinnitus would be associated with results of self-reported subjective questionnaire. An experimental group (12 subjects with tinnitus and hearing loss) was compared to non-tinnitus control group (11 subjects with hearing loss), whose audiometric thresholds were statistically similar between two groups. Individual ANLs were measured across five types of background noise (1-male, 1-female, 2-talker, 4-talker, and 8-talker maskers). The self-reported subjective questionnaire evaluated individual subjective handicap of tinnitus and relevant depression. Results showed that the experimental group had relatively more annoyance from noise (higher ANLs) compared to control group, regardless of the type of background noise. From the results of subjective questionnaires, we found that listeners who reported more handicap of tinnitus had less tolerance of background noise (higher ANLs). In conclusion, tinnitus may affect subjective capacity to accept background noise while following a target story, and it can be related with subjective handicap from tinnitus.
耳鸣伴听力损失患者可接受噪声水平(ANL)与自述主观问卷的相关性研究
本研究旨在确定有耳鸣和听力损失的受试者是否比只有听力损失的受试者更难以忍受噪音。本研究还评估了耳鸣听者的可接受噪声水平(ANL)是否与自我报告的主观问卷结果相关。实验组(12名耳鸣伴听力损失者)与非耳鸣对照组(11名听力损失者)比较,两组听力学阈值差异有统计学意义。在五种背景噪音(1男、1女、2人说话、4人说话和8人说话的面具)中测量个体anl。自我报告的主观问卷评估个人主观耳鸣障碍和相关抑郁。结果表明,与对照组相比,无论背景噪声的类型如何,实验组对噪声的厌烦程度都相对较高(ANLs更高)。从主观问卷调查的结果来看,我们发现耳鸣障碍程度越高的听众对背景噪音的容忍度越低(anl越高)。综上所述,耳鸣可能会影响目标故事的主观接受背景噪音的能力,并可能与耳鸣的主观障碍有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信