Recognition of Time-compressed Words in Adults and Children

Hyemi Park, Hyunsook Jang
{"title":"Recognition of Time-compressed Words in Adults and Children","authors":"Hyemi Park, Hyunsook Jang","doi":"10.21848/AUDIOL.2012.8.1.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognition of Time-compressed Words in Adults and Children Hyemi Park and Hyunsook Jang Graduate Program in Audiology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Audiology & Speech Pathology Research Institute, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea The purpose of this study was to identify recognition abilities of time-compressed speech in order to apply the assessment of central auditory function. Two Korean monosyllabic word lists, the KS-list and the H-list were compressed with four ratios: 45, 55, 65, and 75%. Furthermore, the list equivalency of each list was examined with the compression ratio of 65%. The subjects of this study included 24 adults, and 36 school-aged children, having normal hearing sensitivity. The results of this study were summarized as follows: First, as the compression ratio increased from 45% to 75%, recognition performance decreased significantly from 88.00% to 29.67% for the KS-list and from 93.60% to 39.00% for the H-list. There were no significant recognition differences except for 75% in the compressed ratio when comparing recognition scores between the two lists. In children, recognition performance of compressed speech was significantly decreased from 71.47% to 30.93% in the lower grade group (mean: 8.2) and from 94.93% to 30.93% in the higher grade group (mean: 11.7) as compression ratio increased from 45% to 75%. Within five conditions, 0, 45, 55, 65, and 75%, there were no significant recognition differences between the two groups. Second, the four sub-lists of each word list for adults under the 65% compression ratio revealed no significant differences in the recognition scores, thus confirming the equivalency of each word list. This study showed that the recognition performance of children was lower than adults in all compression ratios. Therefore, the results suggest that different compression ratios might be used for adults and children when applying the measurement of central auditory processing. Appropriate compression ratios for adults are between 45% and 55%, and for children, it is below 45%.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"8 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/AUDIOL.2012.8.1.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recognition of Time-compressed Words in Adults and Children Hyemi Park and Hyunsook Jang Graduate Program in Audiology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Audiology & Speech Pathology Research Institute, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea The purpose of this study was to identify recognition abilities of time-compressed speech in order to apply the assessment of central auditory function. Two Korean monosyllabic word lists, the KS-list and the H-list were compressed with four ratios: 45, 55, 65, and 75%. Furthermore, the list equivalency of each list was examined with the compression ratio of 65%. The subjects of this study included 24 adults, and 36 school-aged children, having normal hearing sensitivity. The results of this study were summarized as follows: First, as the compression ratio increased from 45% to 75%, recognition performance decreased significantly from 88.00% to 29.67% for the KS-list and from 93.60% to 39.00% for the H-list. There were no significant recognition differences except for 75% in the compressed ratio when comparing recognition scores between the two lists. In children, recognition performance of compressed speech was significantly decreased from 71.47% to 30.93% in the lower grade group (mean: 8.2) and from 94.93% to 30.93% in the higher grade group (mean: 11.7) as compression ratio increased from 45% to 75%. Within five conditions, 0, 45, 55, 65, and 75%, there were no significant recognition differences between the two groups. Second, the four sub-lists of each word list for adults under the 65% compression ratio revealed no significant differences in the recognition scores, thus confirming the equivalency of each word list. This study showed that the recognition performance of children was lower than adults in all compression ratios. Therefore, the results suggest that different compression ratios might be used for adults and children when applying the measurement of central auditory processing. Appropriate compression ratios for adults are between 45% and 55%, and for children, it is below 45%.
成人和儿童对时间压缩词的识别
识别时间紧迫的话在成人和儿童Hyemi公园和Hyunsook张成泽在听力学研究生项目,Hallym大学系统,韩国言语病理学与听力学、听力学及言语病理学研究所Hallym大学系统、韩国本研究的目的是确定识别能力的演讲时间紧迫为了应用中枢听觉功能的评估。两个韩语单音节词表,KS-list和H-list分别用45,55,65和75%的比例进行压缩。此外,以65%的压缩比检验了每个列表的列表等效性。这项研究的对象包括24名成年人和36名听力正常的学龄儿童。研究结果如下:第一,当压缩比从45%增加到75%时,ks列表的识别性能从88.00%下降到29.67%,h列表的识别性能从93.60%下降到39.00%。对比两种表的识别分数,除了压缩比有75%的差异外,没有显著的识别差异。在儿童中,当压缩比从45%增加到75%时,低年级组的压缩语音识别能力从71.47%下降到30.93%(平均:8.2),高年级组从94.93%下降到30.93%(平均:11.7)。在0、45、55、65和75%这五种情况下,两组之间没有显著的认知差异。其次,在65%压缩比下,成人每个词表的四个子表在识别得分上没有显著差异,从而证实了每个词表的等效性。本研究发现,儿童在所有压缩比下的识别表现都低于成人。因此,在测量中枢听觉加工时,成人和儿童可采用不同的压缩比。成人合适的压缩比在45% - 55%之间,儿童宜低于45%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信