History Teacher Certification Standards in the States

S. D. Brown
{"title":"History Teacher Certification Standards in the States","authors":"S. D. Brown","doi":"10.2307/30036803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DURING THE LAST TWENTY YEARS, history educators have noted a sea change in the concern expressed by scholars, policymakers, and the general public about the teaching and learning of history in schools. The 1983 report, A Nation at Risk, was a catalyst for this movement with its focused attention and support for a core curriculum based on academic subjects. Subsequent movements for national goals, national standards, and history specific testing in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) illustrated the influence of A Nation at Risk and the growing concern for inclusion of history in a substantive, strengthened academic core curriculum. In concert with a rising interest in history education, concern developed about the quality of teacher education and teacher certification. Many researchers, theorists, and specialists voiced their perspective on the issue of teacher certification.' Of particular interest for history educators is the extent to which teachers of history are certified to teach the discipline and specifically what being \"certified\" entails. Given this context, in the spring of 2002 John J. Patrick, now professor emeritus at Indiana University, and I began to investigate the state of history education nationwide. Our study addressed teacher certification in history; content standards for teachers; content standards for students; high school graduation and exit examination requirements in","PeriodicalId":83054,"journal":{"name":"The History teacher","volume":"39 1","pages":"367-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/30036803","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The History teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/30036803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

DURING THE LAST TWENTY YEARS, history educators have noted a sea change in the concern expressed by scholars, policymakers, and the general public about the teaching and learning of history in schools. The 1983 report, A Nation at Risk, was a catalyst for this movement with its focused attention and support for a core curriculum based on academic subjects. Subsequent movements for national goals, national standards, and history specific testing in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) illustrated the influence of A Nation at Risk and the growing concern for inclusion of history in a substantive, strengthened academic core curriculum. In concert with a rising interest in history education, concern developed about the quality of teacher education and teacher certification. Many researchers, theorists, and specialists voiced their perspective on the issue of teacher certification.' Of particular interest for history educators is the extent to which teachers of history are certified to teach the discipline and specifically what being "certified" entails. Given this context, in the spring of 2002 John J. Patrick, now professor emeritus at Indiana University, and I began to investigate the state of history education nationwide. Our study addressed teacher certification in history; content standards for teachers; content standards for students; high school graduation and exit examination requirements in
美国历史教师资格认证标准
在过去的二十年里,历史教育者注意到学者、政策制定者和公众对学校历史教学的关注发生了巨大变化。1983年的报告《一个处于危险中的国家》(A Nation at Risk)是这一运动的催化剂,它重点关注和支持以学术科目为基础的核心课程。随后的国家目标、国家标准和国家教育进步评估(NAEP)中的历史专项测试运动表明了《处于危险中的国家》的影响,以及对将历史纳入实质性、强化的学术核心课程的日益关注。随着人们对历史教育的兴趣日益浓厚,对教师教育质量和教师资格认证的关注也越来越多。许多研究人员、理论家和专家都对教师资格认证问题发表了自己的看法。历史教育者特别感兴趣的是,历史教师在多大程度上获得了教授这门学科的认证,特别是“认证”意味着什么。有鉴于此,2002年春,现为印第安纳大学名誉教授的约翰·j·帕特里克(John J. Patrick)和我开始调查全国历史教育的现状。我们的研究涉及历史教师资格认证;教师内容标准;学生内容标准;高中毕业和毕业考试要求在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信