Legal Framework for the Procurement of Public-Private Partnerships – An Australian Perspective in the European Union Context

Marta Andhov
{"title":"Legal Framework for the Procurement of Public-Private Partnerships – An Australian Perspective in the European Union Context","authors":"Marta Andhov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2910909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on an assumption that in its current shape the EU public procurement framework is a highly regulated and rigid system, in which delivery of successful PPP contracts may be hindered, in this paper it will be considered, whether there could be a different, more beneficial way in which to award PPP contracts. The question is whether an exclusion of the PPP award contract from the Public Sector Directive could be an adequate solution. It is worth considering, whether such a change would provide the flexibility needed and whether, at the same time, it could lead to a lack of legal certainty and hinder the development of EU integration.In order to answer the posed questions the author will apply a general systemic approach. The characteristics of this approach is to introduce and compare – at an overall level – the highly regulated European procurement system to another system which has an absolutely different approach towards procurement in order to investigate, whether an exclusion of PPP contracts from public procurement directives in the EU could be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":82658,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian studies in law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian studies in law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on an assumption that in its current shape the EU public procurement framework is a highly regulated and rigid system, in which delivery of successful PPP contracts may be hindered, in this paper it will be considered, whether there could be a different, more beneficial way in which to award PPP contracts. The question is whether an exclusion of the PPP award contract from the Public Sector Directive could be an adequate solution. It is worth considering, whether such a change would provide the flexibility needed and whether, at the same time, it could lead to a lack of legal certainty and hinder the development of EU integration.In order to answer the posed questions the author will apply a general systemic approach. The characteristics of this approach is to introduce and compare – at an overall level – the highly regulated European procurement system to another system which has an absolutely different approach towards procurement in order to investigate, whether an exclusion of PPP contracts from public procurement directives in the EU could be beneficial.
采购公私伙伴关系的法律框架——欧盟背景下澳大利亚的视角
基于目前欧盟公共采购框架是一个高度监管和僵化的系统的假设,在这种情况下,成功的PPP合同的交付可能会受到阻碍,本文将考虑是否可能有一种不同的、更有益的方式来授予PPP合同。问题是将PPP合同排除在公共部门指令之外是否是一个适当的解决方案。值得考虑的是,这种变化是否会提供所需的灵活性,同时,它是否会导致缺乏法律确定性,阻碍欧盟一体化的发展。为了回答所提出的问题,作者将采用一般的系统方法。这种方法的特点是在整体层面上,将高度管制的欧洲采购系统与另一种采购方式完全不同的系统进行介绍和比较,以调查在欧盟的公共采购指令中排除PPP合同是否有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信