Comparative chemometric analysis, ranking and selection of lipophilicity parameters of 6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine derivatives with acyclic and cyclic substituents

Q3 Engineering
Benjamin Salaković, Strahinja Z. Kovačević, Milica Karadzic-Banjac, L. Jevric, S. Podunavac-Kuzmanovic, D. Antonović
{"title":"Comparative chemometric analysis, ranking and selection of lipophilicity parameters of 6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine derivatives with acyclic and cyclic substituents","authors":"Benjamin Salaković, Strahinja Z. Kovačević, Milica Karadzic-Banjac, L. Jevric, S. Podunavac-Kuzmanovic, D. Antonović","doi":"10.2298/apt2253088s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present paper, the chemometric analysis, ranking and selection of the most suitable in silico lipophilicity parameters of eight alkyl and cycloalkyl s-triazine derivatives were carried out. The lipophilicity parameters were calculated using various computational approaches and computer programs. The conducted analysis is the basis for further studies aimed to define, compare and examine the influence of alkyl and cycloalkyl substituents, introduced in 6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine structure, on molecular lipophilicity and bioactivity. The chemometric methods used in the study are pattern recognition methods, such as hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and sum of ranking differences (SRD). The obtained ranking results indicate that the following in silico lipophilicity descriptors can be chosen as the most suitable for interpretation of lipophilicity of the studied series of s-triazine derivatives: AlogP, MlogP, WLOGP, logPKLOP and logPPHYS. The lipophilicity descriptor iLOGP was marked as the least suitable lipophilicity descriptor of the studied series of compounds. The ranking results were validated by 7-fold cross-validation approach and by comparison of ranks by random numbers (CRRN).","PeriodicalId":7021,"journal":{"name":"Acta Periodica Technologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Periodica Technologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/apt2253088s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the present paper, the chemometric analysis, ranking and selection of the most suitable in silico lipophilicity parameters of eight alkyl and cycloalkyl s-triazine derivatives were carried out. The lipophilicity parameters were calculated using various computational approaches and computer programs. The conducted analysis is the basis for further studies aimed to define, compare and examine the influence of alkyl and cycloalkyl substituents, introduced in 6-chloro-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine structure, on molecular lipophilicity and bioactivity. The chemometric methods used in the study are pattern recognition methods, such as hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and sum of ranking differences (SRD). The obtained ranking results indicate that the following in silico lipophilicity descriptors can be chosen as the most suitable for interpretation of lipophilicity of the studied series of s-triazine derivatives: AlogP, MlogP, WLOGP, logPKLOP and logPPHYS. The lipophilicity descriptor iLOGP was marked as the least suitable lipophilicity descriptor of the studied series of compounds. The ranking results were validated by 7-fold cross-validation approach and by comparison of ranks by random numbers (CRRN).
含无环和环取代基的6-氯-1,3,5-三嗪衍生物亲脂性参数的比较化学计量分析、排序和选择
本文对8个烷基和环烷基s-三嗪衍生物的硅亲脂性参数进行了化学计量分析,并进行了排序和选择。用各种计算方法和计算机程序计算了亲脂性参数。所进行的分析是进一步研究的基础,旨在定义、比较和检验6-氯-1,3,5-三嗪-2,4-二胺结构中引入的烷基和环烷基取代基对分子亲脂性和生物活性的影响。研究中使用的化学计量学方法是模式识别方法,如层次聚类分析(HCA)和等级差异和(SRD)。所得的排序结果表明,可以选择以下硅亲脂性描述符来解释所研究的系列s-三嗪衍生物的亲脂性:AlogP、MlogP、WLOGP、logPKLOP和logPPHYS。亲脂性描述符iLOGP是所研究系列化合物中最不适合的亲脂性描述符。采用7重交叉验证法和随机数字排序法(CRRN)对排序结果进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Periodica Technologica
Acta Periodica Technologica Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信