Dose distribution verification for GZP6 sources: a comparison of Monte Carlo, radiochromic film, and GZP6 treatment planning system

Q4 Medicine
Bahreyni Toossi, M. Ghorbani, A. A. Mowlavi, A. Hashemian, Soleimani Ali Meigooni
{"title":"Dose distribution verification for GZP6 sources: a comparison of Monte Carlo, radiochromic film, and GZP6 treatment planning system","authors":"Bahreyni Toossi, M. Ghorbani, A. A. Mowlavi, A. Hashemian, Soleimani Ali Meigooni","doi":"10.2298/AOO1202003T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Background: Treatment planning systems (TPSs) are used for dose calculations in dose delivery by afterload- ing brachytherapy machines. Such planning systems usually use simplified algorithms in their dose calculations. Verification of dose distributions produced by TPS is of clinical importance and is part of a quality assurance program. In this study, the dose distributions generated by GZP6 TPS for two GZP6 sources were verified. Methods: The evaluation was based on the inter comparisons between the isodose curves obtained through Monte Carlo simulations, radiochromic film measurements, and GZP6 treatment planning system. MCNPX Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the sources. Dose measurements were performed in a perspex phantom using Gafchromic® EBT radiochromic films. Comparisons between the results obtained from MC, RCF, and TPS were performed by gamma function calculations with 5% dose/2 mm distance criterion. Results: Based on gamma calculations our results showed that there was good agreement between the dose distribu- tions obtained by the three aforementioned methods in both transverse and longitudinal planes for the GZP6 source No.2. However, for source No. 5, the agreement was good in the transverse plane but it was low in the longitudinal plane. Conclusion: The results showed that dose distributions certified by the GZP6 TPS for the GZP6 source No. 2 were validated. However, for source No. 5 some discrepancies were observed. Accurate knowledge of the activity of each active pellet in the source No. 5 can clarify the cause of the discrepancies.","PeriodicalId":35645,"journal":{"name":"Archive of Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2298/AOO1202003T","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/AOO1202003T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SUMMARY Background: Treatment planning systems (TPSs) are used for dose calculations in dose delivery by afterload- ing brachytherapy machines. Such planning systems usually use simplified algorithms in their dose calculations. Verification of dose distributions produced by TPS is of clinical importance and is part of a quality assurance program. In this study, the dose distributions generated by GZP6 TPS for two GZP6 sources were verified. Methods: The evaluation was based on the inter comparisons between the isodose curves obtained through Monte Carlo simulations, radiochromic film measurements, and GZP6 treatment planning system. MCNPX Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the sources. Dose measurements were performed in a perspex phantom using Gafchromic® EBT radiochromic films. Comparisons between the results obtained from MC, RCF, and TPS were performed by gamma function calculations with 5% dose/2 mm distance criterion. Results: Based on gamma calculations our results showed that there was good agreement between the dose distribu- tions obtained by the three aforementioned methods in both transverse and longitudinal planes for the GZP6 source No.2. However, for source No. 5, the agreement was good in the transverse plane but it was low in the longitudinal plane. Conclusion: The results showed that dose distributions certified by the GZP6 TPS for the GZP6 source No. 2 were validated. However, for source No. 5 some discrepancies were observed. Accurate knowledge of the activity of each active pellet in the source No. 5 can clarify the cause of the discrepancies.
GZP6源的剂量分布验证:蒙特卡罗、放射变色膜和GZP6治疗计划系统的比较
背景:治疗计划系统(tps)用于后负荷近距离放疗机给药时的剂量计算。这种计划系统通常在剂量计算中使用简化算法。TPS产生的剂量分布的验证具有临床重要性,是质量保证计划的一部分。本研究验证了GZP6 TPS对两种GZP6源产生的剂量分布。方法:通过蒙特卡罗模拟得到的等剂量曲线、放射线致色膜测量和GZP6治疗计划系统进行相互比较。用MCNPX蒙特卡罗代码模拟的源码。剂量测量使用Gafchromic®EBT放射变色膜在有机玻璃模体中进行。MC、RCF和TPS的结果采用gamma函数计算,以5%剂量/ 2mm距离标准进行比较。结果:伽玛计算结果表明,上述三种方法得到的GZP6源2在横向和纵向上的剂量分布具有较好的一致性。而5号源在横切面上一致性较好,而在纵切面上一致性较差。结论:GZP6 2号源经GZP6 TPS认证的剂量分布是正确的。但是,对于第5号来源,观察到一些差异。准确了解5号源中每个活性颗粒的活性,可以澄清差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archive of Oncology
Archive of Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archive of Oncology is an international oncology journal that publishes original research, editorials, review articles, case (clinical) reports, and news from oncology (medical, surgical, radiation), experimental oncology, cancer epidemiology, and prevention. Letters are also welcomed. Archive of Oncology is covered by Biomedicina Vojvodina, Biomedicina Serbica, Biomedicina Oncologica, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, ExtraMED and SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信