Analysis of search engines of open access institutional repositories

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Lucelia Almeida, T. M. R. Dias
{"title":"Analysis of search engines of open access institutional repositories","authors":"Lucelia Almeida, T. M. R. Dias","doi":"10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8672274/32134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Scientific communication in its new model of performance, openly enabling access to information, has contributed that society can resort to scientific production in an easier way, which has occurred due to its availability in open access journals and institutional repositories. In a scientific context, the retrieval of information provides access to intellectual production from the possibility of its search in retrieval systems. Objective: To analyze the information retrieval systems (IRS) based on the search tools of the Brazilian institutional repositories of theses and dissertations available in the BDTD and its databases, comparing them with the parameters established by IBICT. Methodology: Conducts bibliographic research on the theme and documentary research from access to the standards, guidelines, and manuals provided by IBICT.Results: It confirms that the institutions participating in the BDTD do not necessarily need to stick to the standards in a partial way established by IBICT, being necessary only that they assign to their repositories the mandatory metadata standards, along with the use of the OAI-PMH protocol and the use of XML technology so that the collection of data occurs for availability in the national BDTD portal. Conclusion: The information retrieval systems of the repositories have technological tools and specifications that confer navigation in the systems by the users, contributing to the best search experience and access to information relevant to their informational issues.","PeriodicalId":36988,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8672274/32134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Scientific communication in its new model of performance, openly enabling access to information, has contributed that society can resort to scientific production in an easier way, which has occurred due to its availability in open access journals and institutional repositories. In a scientific context, the retrieval of information provides access to intellectual production from the possibility of its search in retrieval systems. Objective: To analyze the information retrieval systems (IRS) based on the search tools of the Brazilian institutional repositories of theses and dissertations available in the BDTD and its databases, comparing them with the parameters established by IBICT. Methodology: Conducts bibliographic research on the theme and documentary research from access to the standards, guidelines, and manuals provided by IBICT.Results: It confirms that the institutions participating in the BDTD do not necessarily need to stick to the standards in a partial way established by IBICT, being necessary only that they assign to their repositories the mandatory metadata standards, along with the use of the OAI-PMH protocol and the use of XML technology so that the collection of data occurs for availability in the national BDTD portal. Conclusion: The information retrieval systems of the repositories have technological tools and specifications that confer navigation in the systems by the users, contributing to the best search experience and access to information relevant to their informational issues.
开放存取机构知识库的搜索引擎分析
引言:科学传播以其新的绩效模式,公开地使人们能够获取信息,这有助于社会以更容易的方式求助于科学生产,这是由于它可以在开放获取期刊和机构知识库中获得。在科学环境中,信息的检索提供了通过检索系统中检索的可能性来获取知识成果的途径。目的:分析基于BDTD及其数据库中巴西机构论文库检索工具的信息检索系统(IRS),并与IBICT建立的参数进行比较。方法:对主题进行书目研究,并对IBICT提供的标准、指南和手册进行文献研究。结果:它证实了参与BDTD的机构不一定需要以IBICT建立的部分方式坚持标准,只需要将强制性元数据标准分配给其存储库,以及使用OAI-PMH协议和使用XML技术,以便在国家BDTD门户中收集可用的数据。结论:图书馆的信息检索系统具有技术工具和规范,可以使用户在系统中导航,有助于获得最佳的搜索体验和获取与他们的信息问题相关的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信