Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
N. Ribeiro, Dalgiza Oliveira, Célia Dias, Angélica Miranda
{"title":"Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders","authors":"N. Ribeiro, Dalgiza Oliveira, Célia Dias, Angélica Miranda","doi":"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366/29816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective:In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method:A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results:With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion:Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating thefrequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.","PeriodicalId":36988,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366/29816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective:In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method:A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results:With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion:Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating thefrequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.
从利益相关者的角度看开放科学和科学传播实践的重要性
引言:由几个运动组成,开放科学在寻求增加对研究结果的信心,寻求构成科学调查过程的所有元素的透明度方面已经获得了相当大的声誉。目的:在这种情况下,本文旨在分析参与开放科学及其运动和倡议的行动者所具有的重要性。方法:向参与科学过程的人士发送一份调查问卷:通过互联网的音频和视频发送两组消息和通信应用程序,以及由图书管理员、研究人员、教授和编辑组成的对该主题感兴趣的参与者的讨论列表。由1个开放问题和20个与开放科学相关的变量组成,受访者被指示在5分李克特量表上指出每个问题的重要性,观察公立大学发展的科学传播背景。结果:采用SPSS软件对频率和平均值进行描述性统计分析。此外,还应用了因子分析,并确定了将信息浓缩为四个组成部分的可能性。结论:通过这项研究,得出的结论是,尽管频率交替,但所有变量都注册了最重要的模式,这表明研究中列出的所有倡议和运动都被参与开放科学的参与者认为是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信