The Language of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Public Health Misinformation: Distrust, Unwillingness, and Uncertainty

Q1 Arts and Humanities
G. Lăzăroiu, R. Mihăilă, L. Braniște
{"title":"The Language of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Public Health Misinformation: Distrust, Unwillingness, and Uncertainty","authors":"G. Lăzăroiu, R. Mihăilă, L. Braniște","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the language of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and public health misinformation in relation to distrust, unwillingness, and uncertainty. Using and replicating data from CEAL, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, MissionSquare Research Institute, MSDH/ OPHHE, OECD, Pandemic Action Network, and WHO, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistance. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the language of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and public health misinformation in relation to distrust, unwillingness, and uncertainty. Using and replicating data from CEAL, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, MissionSquare Research Institute, MSDH/ OPHHE, OECD, Pandemic Action Network, and WHO, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistance. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
COVID-19疫苗犹豫和公共卫生错误信息的语言:不信任,不愿意和不确定性
本文的目的是综合和分析COVID-19疫苗犹豫和公共卫生错误信息与不信任,不愿意和不确定性相关的语言的现有证据。我们使用并复制了来自CEAL、Healthwatch Bexley、KFF、MissionSquare研究所、MSDH/ OPHHE、经合组织、大流行行动网络和世卫组织的数据,对COVID-19疫苗接受度、犹豫度和耐药性进行了分析和估计。在适当情况下,对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Review of Contemporary Philosophy Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信