"I Will Gather All Nations": Resistance, Culture, and Pan-African Collaboration in Denmark Vesey's South Carolina

W. Rucker
{"title":"\"I Will Gather All Nations\": Resistance, Culture, and Pan-African Collaboration in Denmark Vesey's South Carolina","authors":"W. Rucker","doi":"10.2307/1350161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From U.B. Phillips' contention that Africans were \"inertly obeying minds and muscles\" to the pioneering work of Herbert Aptheker, the historiographical discourse on American slave resistance has undergone a dramatic paradigm shift over the past century. (1) Despite considerable opposition to both his political affiliations and his theoretical approach, Aptheker successfully created the foundation from which future studies of slave resistance would begin. Writing in the 1940s, Aptheker built upon the works of such black scholars as W.E.B. DuBois and Carter G. Woodson by arguing that Africans never accepted their collective conditions under slavery and this sentiment was occasionally expressed in the form of insurrection and other types of resistance. He points to over two hundred and fifty alleged rebellions and conspiracies as evidence of the widespread nature of slave discontent. (2) To Aptheker, the root cause of slave revolts was slavery, a conclusion which undermines any romantic perception of plantation life. He also viewed slave resistance as a necessary and natural phenomenon; in essence, it was a human response to inhumane conditions. In the \"Preface\" to his 1969 edition of American Negro Slave Revolts, Aptheker claims that \"Humans, no matter of what color, being humans (sic) have rebelled when their treatment was bestial and when opportunity and capacity for rebellion was present.\" A similar sentiment is voiced by Kenneth Stampp in his 1956 work entitled The Peculiar Institution. In this sustained rebuttal of Phillips, Stampp states that \"I have assumed that the slaves were merely ordinary human beings, that innately Negroes are, after all, only white men with black skins, nothing more, nothing less.\" (3) These statements, while well intentioned, can obscure as much as they reveal. Though it can be maintained that resistance is indeed a human reaction, this notion may not fully reflect the nuanced and multi-faceted realities evident in the African Diaspora. Slaves were human beings as well as Africans from specific socio-political contexts and cultural backgrounds. While the conclusion that resistance is a human response might be true on the most rudimentary level, it would only seem logical that the types of resistance engaged in by slaves were largely determined and shaped by their African past. Historians Stanley Elkins, Richard Dunn, and Albert Raboteau have all argued that African \"tribalism\" and cultural diversity contributed heavily to undermining the possibilities of slave collaboration and resistance. Dunn epitomizes this by noting that both linguistic barriers and tribal rivalries \"hindered these blacks, once enslaved, from combining against their masters.\" Additionally, Raboteau claims that \"[t]ribal and linguistic groups were broken up, either on the coasts of Africa or in the slave pens across the Atlantic. ...In the New World slave control was based on the eradication of all forms of African culture because of their power to unify slaves and thus enable them to resist or rebel.\" (4) The essential argument being made by these scholars is that the very nature of the transplanted African cultures in the Americas, in this case the assumed unbridgeable diversity between African groups, was an obstacle to organized slave resistance. The contention made in this current study is quite the opposit e, however. This study will demonstrate that African culture and Pan-African connections brought together enslaved Africans, from various backgrounds, and facilitated resistance during Denmark Vesey's 1822 conspiracy. The Charleston Plot and Subsequent Trials Serving in its principal role as the main entry for many Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina slaves, the city of Charleston was a key commercial center in the Atlantic commercial network during the era of the slave trade. Daily auctions of African and American born slaves held on Vendue Range Street, near the aptly named Exchange building, were so common that by 1790 the city of Charleston began to assume a distinctly African flavor. …","PeriodicalId":83125,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Negro history","volume":"86 1","pages":"132 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1350161","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Negro history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1350161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

From U.B. Phillips' contention that Africans were "inertly obeying minds and muscles" to the pioneering work of Herbert Aptheker, the historiographical discourse on American slave resistance has undergone a dramatic paradigm shift over the past century. (1) Despite considerable opposition to both his political affiliations and his theoretical approach, Aptheker successfully created the foundation from which future studies of slave resistance would begin. Writing in the 1940s, Aptheker built upon the works of such black scholars as W.E.B. DuBois and Carter G. Woodson by arguing that Africans never accepted their collective conditions under slavery and this sentiment was occasionally expressed in the form of insurrection and other types of resistance. He points to over two hundred and fifty alleged rebellions and conspiracies as evidence of the widespread nature of slave discontent. (2) To Aptheker, the root cause of slave revolts was slavery, a conclusion which undermines any romantic perception of plantation life. He also viewed slave resistance as a necessary and natural phenomenon; in essence, it was a human response to inhumane conditions. In the "Preface" to his 1969 edition of American Negro Slave Revolts, Aptheker claims that "Humans, no matter of what color, being humans (sic) have rebelled when their treatment was bestial and when opportunity and capacity for rebellion was present." A similar sentiment is voiced by Kenneth Stampp in his 1956 work entitled The Peculiar Institution. In this sustained rebuttal of Phillips, Stampp states that "I have assumed that the slaves were merely ordinary human beings, that innately Negroes are, after all, only white men with black skins, nothing more, nothing less." (3) These statements, while well intentioned, can obscure as much as they reveal. Though it can be maintained that resistance is indeed a human reaction, this notion may not fully reflect the nuanced and multi-faceted realities evident in the African Diaspora. Slaves were human beings as well as Africans from specific socio-political contexts and cultural backgrounds. While the conclusion that resistance is a human response might be true on the most rudimentary level, it would only seem logical that the types of resistance engaged in by slaves were largely determined and shaped by their African past. Historians Stanley Elkins, Richard Dunn, and Albert Raboteau have all argued that African "tribalism" and cultural diversity contributed heavily to undermining the possibilities of slave collaboration and resistance. Dunn epitomizes this by noting that both linguistic barriers and tribal rivalries "hindered these blacks, once enslaved, from combining against their masters." Additionally, Raboteau claims that "[t]ribal and linguistic groups were broken up, either on the coasts of Africa or in the slave pens across the Atlantic. ...In the New World slave control was based on the eradication of all forms of African culture because of their power to unify slaves and thus enable them to resist or rebel." (4) The essential argument being made by these scholars is that the very nature of the transplanted African cultures in the Americas, in this case the assumed unbridgeable diversity between African groups, was an obstacle to organized slave resistance. The contention made in this current study is quite the opposit e, however. This study will demonstrate that African culture and Pan-African connections brought together enslaved Africans, from various backgrounds, and facilitated resistance during Denmark Vesey's 1822 conspiracy. The Charleston Plot and Subsequent Trials Serving in its principal role as the main entry for many Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina slaves, the city of Charleston was a key commercial center in the Atlantic commercial network during the era of the slave trade. Daily auctions of African and American born slaves held on Vendue Range Street, near the aptly named Exchange building, were so common that by 1790 the city of Charleston began to assume a distinctly African flavor. …
“我将聚集所有国家”:丹麦南卡罗来纳的抵抗、文化和泛非合作
从菲利普斯(U.B. Phillips)关于非洲人“本能地服从思想和肌肉”的观点,到赫伯特·阿普泰克(Herbert Aptheker)的开创性工作,在过去的一个世纪里,关于美国奴隶抵抗运动的史学论述经历了巨大的范式转变。(1)尽管他的政治立场和理论方法都遭到了相当大的反对,阿普塞克还是成功地为以后对奴隶抵抗的研究奠定了基础。写作于20世纪40年代,阿普塞克以W.E.B.杜波依斯和卡特g伍德森等黑人学者的作品为基础,提出非洲人从未接受他们在奴隶制下的集体状况,这种情绪偶尔会以起义和其他形式的抵抗来表达。他指出了250多起所谓的叛乱和阴谋,作为奴隶普遍不满的证据。(2)在阿普塞克看来,奴隶起义的根本原因是奴隶制,这一结论破坏了对种植园生活的任何浪漫看法。他还认为奴隶反抗是一种必要和自然的现象;从本质上讲,这是人类对非人道条件的反应。在他1969年出版的《美国黑人奴隶起义》的序言中,阿普塞克声称:“人类,无论什么肤色,作为人类(原文如此),当他们受到残忍的对待时,当他们有机会和能力反抗时,他们就会反抗。”肯尼斯·斯坦普在他1956年的作品《奇特的制度》中表达了类似的观点。在这篇持续反驳菲利普斯的文章中,斯坦普说:“我认为奴隶只是普通人,天生的黑人毕竟只是黑皮肤的白人,不多也不少。”(3)这些陈述虽然用意良好,但也可能掩盖了它们所揭示的内容。尽管可以坚持认为抵抗确实是人类的一种反应,但这一概念可能无法完全反映出非洲侨民明显的微妙和多方面的现实。奴隶是人类,也是来自特定社会政治背景和文化背景的非洲人。虽然抵抗是人类反应的结论在最基本的层面上可能是正确的,但奴隶所进行的抵抗类型在很大程度上是由他们在非洲的经历决定和塑造的,这似乎是合乎逻辑的。历史学家斯坦利·埃尔金斯(Stanley Elkins)、理查德·邓恩(Richard Dunn)和阿尔伯特·拉布托(Albert Raboteau)都认为,非洲的“部落主义”和文化多样性在很大程度上削弱了奴隶合作和抵抗的可能性。邓恩对这一点的概括是,语言障碍和部落对抗“阻碍了这些曾经被奴役的黑人联合起来反抗他们的主人”。此外,Raboteau声称“部落和语言群体被打破了,要么在非洲海岸,要么在大西洋彼岸的奴隶圈. ...在新大陆,对奴隶的控制是建立在消灭所有形式的非洲文化的基础上的,因为他们有能力统一奴隶,从而使他们能够抵抗或反叛。”(4)这些学者提出的主要论点是,移植到美洲的非洲文化的本质,在这种情况下,假定非洲群体之间不可逾越的多样性,是有组织的奴隶抵抗的障碍。然而,目前这项研究的论点恰恰相反。本研究将证明非洲文化和泛非联系将来自不同背景的被奴役的非洲人聚集在一起,并促进了丹麦维西1822年阴谋期间的抵抗。查尔斯顿是许多乔治亚州、南卡罗来纳和北卡罗来纳奴隶的主要入口,在奴隶贸易时代,查尔斯顿市是大西洋商业网络的一个重要商业中心。每天在Vendue Range街举行的非洲和美国出生的奴隶拍卖会,在名副其实的交易大楼附近,是如此普遍,以至于到1790年,查尔斯顿市开始呈现出明显的非洲风味。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信