Delivery Apps Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Consumer Satisfaction Judgments, Behavioral Intentions, and Purchase Decisions

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Katarina Frajtova – Michalikova
{"title":"Delivery Apps Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Consumer Satisfaction Judgments, Behavioral Intentions, and Purchase Decisions","authors":"Katarina Frajtova – Michalikova","doi":"10.22381/emfm17120225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on delivery apps use during the COVID-19 pandemic. With increasing evidence of app-based sales systems, there is an essential demand for comprehending whether perceived control over food delivery apps may strengthen consumer feelings. In this research, prior findings were cumulated indicating that consumer habits in identifying information as regards ready-to-eat food and making decisions accordingly have reconfigured online delivery. We carried out a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science throughout January 2022, with search terms including \"delivery app\" + \"COVID-19 pandemic,\" \"consumer satisfaction judgment,\" \"behavioral intention,\" and \"purchase decision.\" As we analyzed research published between 2020 and 2022, only 159 papers met the eligibility criteria. By removing controversial or unclear findings (scanty/unimportant data), results unsupported by replication, undetailed content, or papers having quite similar titles, we decided on 24, chiefly empirical, sources. Reporting quality assessment tool: PRISMA. Methodological quality assessment tools include: AXIS, Distiller SR, ROBIS, and SRDR.","PeriodicalId":37224,"journal":{"name":"Economics, Management, and Financial Markets","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics, Management, and Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/emfm17120225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on delivery apps use during the COVID-19 pandemic. With increasing evidence of app-based sales systems, there is an essential demand for comprehending whether perceived control over food delivery apps may strengthen consumer feelings. In this research, prior findings were cumulated indicating that consumer habits in identifying information as regards ready-to-eat food and making decisions accordingly have reconfigured online delivery. We carried out a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science throughout January 2022, with search terms including "delivery app" + "COVID-19 pandemic," "consumer satisfaction judgment," "behavioral intention," and "purchase decision." As we analyzed research published between 2020 and 2022, only 159 papers met the eligibility criteria. By removing controversial or unclear findings (scanty/unimportant data), results unsupported by replication, undetailed content, or papers having quite similar titles, we decided on 24, chiefly empirical, sources. Reporting quality assessment tool: PRISMA. Methodological quality assessment tools include: AXIS, Distiller SR, ROBIS, and SRDR.
COVID-19大流行期间配送应用程序的使用:消费者满意度判断、行为意图和购买决策
本系统综述的目的是综合和分析COVID-19大流行期间快递应用程序使用的现有证据。随着越来越多的基于应用程序的销售系统的出现,人们迫切需要了解对外卖应用程序的感知控制是否会增强消费者的情感。在这项研究中,先前的研究结果表明,消费者在识别即食食品信息并做出相应决策的习惯已经重新配置了在线配送。我们在2022年1月对ProQuest、Scopus和Web of Science进行了定量文献回顾,搜索词包括“外卖app”+“COVID-19大流行”、“消费者满意度判断”、“行为意向”和“购买决策”。我们分析了2020年至2022年间发表的研究,只有159篇论文符合资格标准。通过删除有争议或不明确的发现(少量/不重要的数据),不受复制支持的结果,不详细的内容或标题非常相似的论文,我们决定了24个主要是经验主义的来源。报告质量评估工具:PRISMA。方法学质量评估工具包括:AXIS、Distiller SR、ROBIS和SRDR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economics, Management, and Financial Markets
Economics, Management, and Financial Markets Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信