Social Security: The Broader Issues

C. E. Steuerle
{"title":"Social Security: The Broader Issues","authors":"C. E. Steuerle","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.282318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author argues that the primary Social Security \"issue\" is not how to design that particular system for retirees 50 or 75 years hence. Instead the broader question is whether the federal government budget can be adaptable enough over time to best meet the needs of all people over the next 50 or 75 years. Right now, Social Security and other elderly programs have large amounts of growth built into them in fairly rigid ways. Legislators simply cannot create systems with that much built-in growth without having impacts far beyond the systems themselves. This paper analyzes three major areas affected by the existing structure of growth in elderly programs. The first is the budget. Built-in growth does not just affect future budgets; it is already a major factor affecting current budget battles. The second is the labor force. Social Security induces people to retire at what now must be considered late middle age. If that trend continues as the baby boom generation retires, there will be a significant reduction in the percentage of the adult population that will be working. The third is the needs of the elderly. Because legislators have set growth patterns in ways that are acclimated to deal with problems as perceived in the past, the system has become less targeted toward the most pressing problems of the elderly themselves. In particular, for each additional dollar of expenditures it makes, Social Security is targeting smaller and smaller shares of benefits to either the older or the more needy among the elderly. By predetermining growth rules, however, change is hard to make. The structure of the existing system confronts politicians with the dilemma of reneging on some set of promises if they want to make the system better at meeting its basic purposes. What we face as a society is a much broader question of how well we are going to allocate scarce resources to meet the most important needs of our nation. Demographic changes have merely forced this issue to the fore, but they would be there to some extent anyway. The issue plays itself out in the three topics discussed here: the current and future allocation of the federal budget and how those allocations are affected by automatic built-in growth of a few major programs; the extent of future labor force participation by adults and how current institutional structures may be blocking a very natural movement toward work by what will soon be a very large stock of older - but not necessarily old - people with significant capabilities; and the continual allocation of decreasing shares of the elderly budget away from those elderly with the greatest needs.","PeriodicalId":83483,"journal":{"name":"Washington and Lee law review","volume":"58 1","pages":"1235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington and Lee law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.282318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, the author argues that the primary Social Security "issue" is not how to design that particular system for retirees 50 or 75 years hence. Instead the broader question is whether the federal government budget can be adaptable enough over time to best meet the needs of all people over the next 50 or 75 years. Right now, Social Security and other elderly programs have large amounts of growth built into them in fairly rigid ways. Legislators simply cannot create systems with that much built-in growth without having impacts far beyond the systems themselves. This paper analyzes three major areas affected by the existing structure of growth in elderly programs. The first is the budget. Built-in growth does not just affect future budgets; it is already a major factor affecting current budget battles. The second is the labor force. Social Security induces people to retire at what now must be considered late middle age. If that trend continues as the baby boom generation retires, there will be a significant reduction in the percentage of the adult population that will be working. The third is the needs of the elderly. Because legislators have set growth patterns in ways that are acclimated to deal with problems as perceived in the past, the system has become less targeted toward the most pressing problems of the elderly themselves. In particular, for each additional dollar of expenditures it makes, Social Security is targeting smaller and smaller shares of benefits to either the older or the more needy among the elderly. By predetermining growth rules, however, change is hard to make. The structure of the existing system confronts politicians with the dilemma of reneging on some set of promises if they want to make the system better at meeting its basic purposes. What we face as a society is a much broader question of how well we are going to allocate scarce resources to meet the most important needs of our nation. Demographic changes have merely forced this issue to the fore, but they would be there to some extent anyway. The issue plays itself out in the three topics discussed here: the current and future allocation of the federal budget and how those allocations are affected by automatic built-in growth of a few major programs; the extent of future labor force participation by adults and how current institutional structures may be blocking a very natural movement toward work by what will soon be a very large stock of older - but not necessarily old - people with significant capabilities; and the continual allocation of decreasing shares of the elderly budget away from those elderly with the greatest needs.
社会保障:更广泛的问题
在本文中,作者认为,主要的社会保障“问题”不是如何为50或75年后的退休人员设计特定的制度。相反,更广泛的问题是,随着时间的推移,联邦政府的预算能否有足够的适应性,以最好地满足未来50年或75年所有人的需求。目前,社会保障和其他老年项目以相当僵化的方式建立了大量的增长。立法者根本不可能在不产生远远超出系统本身的影响的情况下创造出具有如此巨大内在增长的系统。本文分析了受现有老年项目增长结构影响的三个主要领域。首先是预算。内在增长不仅影响未来的预算;这已经是影响当前预算之争的一个主要因素。第二是劳动力。社会保障诱使人们在现在看来一定是中年晚期退休。如果随着婴儿潮一代的退休,这一趋势继续下去,成年人口中有工作的比例将显著下降。第三是老年人的需求。由于立法者制定的增长模式已经适应了过去所认为的解决问题的方式,该系统已经不再针对老年人本身最紧迫的问题。特别是,社会保障每增加一美元的支出,它给老年人或老年人中更有需要的人的福利份额就会越来越小。然而,通过预先确定增长规则,很难做出改变。现有体系的结构让政治家们陷入了两难境地,如果他们想让体系更好地满足其基本目的,就必须违背一些承诺。作为一个社会,我们所面临的是一个更广泛的问题,即我们将如何分配稀缺的资源,以满足我们国家最重要的需求。人口结构的变化只是把这个问题推到了前台,但无论如何,它们在某种程度上都会存在。这个问题在这里讨论的三个主题中表现出来:联邦预算的当前和未来分配,以及这些分配如何受到几个主要项目的自动内置增长的影响;未来成年人参与劳动力市场的程度,以及目前的制度结构可能会如何阻碍很快就会有大量具有重要能力的老年人(但不一定是老年人)自然地走向工作岗位;老年人预算的份额不断减少,而那些最需要的老年人却得不到分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信