J. Vėžys, E. Dragašius, K. Juzenas, E. Korobko, A. Mystkowski
{"title":"Comparison of different magneto-rheological fluids’ stability","authors":"J. Vėžys, E. Dragašius, K. Juzenas, E. Korobko, A. Mystkowski","doi":"10.21595/JME.2019.20200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to compare two different methods for describing the sedimentation in different MRFs. It was decided to obtain electric resistivity of the MR fluid under magnetic field and to measure inductance of the solenoid, which is around the MR fluid, for diagnostic of the sedimentation. The electrical resistivity of the MR fluids and inductivity of the solenoid was measured daily for 11 days for 5 different MR fluids: (Lord MRF-140CG, Lord MRF-122EG, Liquids Research Company MRHCCS4-A and Liquids Research Company MRHCCS4-B and MUDZH-3 made in A. V. Luykov Heat and Mass Transfer Institute, Minsk, BY). These two methods and according procedures are described below.","PeriodicalId":42196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Measurements in Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Measurements in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21595/JME.2019.20200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to compare two different methods for describing the sedimentation in different MRFs. It was decided to obtain electric resistivity of the MR fluid under magnetic field and to measure inductance of the solenoid, which is around the MR fluid, for diagnostic of the sedimentation. The electrical resistivity of the MR fluids and inductivity of the solenoid was measured daily for 11 days for 5 different MR fluids: (Lord MRF-140CG, Lord MRF-122EG, Liquids Research Company MRHCCS4-A and Liquids Research Company MRHCCS4-B and MUDZH-3 made in A. V. Luykov Heat and Mass Transfer Institute, Minsk, BY). These two methods and according procedures are described below.
本文的目的是比较两种不同的方法来描述沉积在不同的MRFs。决定取磁流变液在磁场作用下的电阻率,并测量磁流变液周围螺线管的电感值,用于沉降诊断。每天测量5种不同磁流变液(Lord MRF-140CG, Lord MRF-122EG,液体研究公司MRHCCS4-A和液体研究公司MRHCCS4-B和MUDZH-3,明斯克,BY的A. V. Luykov传热传质研究所)的磁流变液的电阻率和螺螺管的电感率,持续11天。下面介绍这两种方法和相应的步骤。