Gentzen's Proof of Normalization for Natural Deduction

IF 0.7 3区 数学 Q1 LOGIC
Jan von Plato
{"title":"Gentzen's Proof of Normalization for Natural Deduction","authors":"Jan von Plato","doi":"10.2178/bsl/1208442829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gentzen writes in the published version of his doctoral thesis Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen (Investigations into logical reasoning) that he was able to prove the normalization theorem only for intuitionistic natural deduction, but not for classical. To cover the latter, he developed classical sequent calculus and proved a corresponding theorem, the famous cut elimination result. Its proof was organized so that a cut elimination result for an intuitionistic sequent calculus came out as a special case, namely the one in which the sequents have at most one formula in the right, succedent part. Thus, there was no need for a direct proof of normalization for intuitionistic natural deduction. The only traces of such a proof in the published thesis are some convertibilities, such as when an implication introduction is followed by an implication elimination [1934–35, II.5.13]. It remained to Dag Prawitz in 1965 to work out a proof of normalization. Another, less known proof was given also in 1965 by Andres Raggio. We found in February 2005 an early handwritten version of Gentzen's thesis, with exactly the above title, but with rather different contents: Most remarkably, it contains a detailed proof of normalization for what became the standard system of natural deduction. The manuscript is located in the Paul Bernays collection at the ETH-Zurichwith the signum Hs. 974: 271. Bernays must have gotten it well before the time of his being expelled from Göttingen on the basis of the racial laws in April 1933.","PeriodicalId":55307,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":"14 1","pages":"240 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2178/bsl/1208442829","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1208442829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Abstract Gentzen writes in the published version of his doctoral thesis Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen (Investigations into logical reasoning) that he was able to prove the normalization theorem only for intuitionistic natural deduction, but not for classical. To cover the latter, he developed classical sequent calculus and proved a corresponding theorem, the famous cut elimination result. Its proof was organized so that a cut elimination result for an intuitionistic sequent calculus came out as a special case, namely the one in which the sequents have at most one formula in the right, succedent part. Thus, there was no need for a direct proof of normalization for intuitionistic natural deduction. The only traces of such a proof in the published thesis are some convertibilities, such as when an implication introduction is followed by an implication elimination [1934–35, II.5.13]. It remained to Dag Prawitz in 1965 to work out a proof of normalization. Another, less known proof was given also in 1965 by Andres Raggio. We found in February 2005 an early handwritten version of Gentzen's thesis, with exactly the above title, but with rather different contents: Most remarkably, it contains a detailed proof of normalization for what became the standard system of natural deduction. The manuscript is located in the Paul Bernays collection at the ETH-Zurichwith the signum Hs. 974: 271. Bernays must have gotten it well before the time of his being expelled from Göttingen on the basis of the racial laws in April 1933.
根岑的自然演绎归一化证明
根岑在其博士论文《逻辑推理的研究》(Untersuchungen ber das logische Schliessen)中写道,他只能证明直觉自然演绎的归一化定理,而不能证明经典演绎的归一化定理。为了解决后者,他发展了经典的序列微积分,并证明了一个相应的定理,即著名的切消定理。它的证明是有组织的,因此直觉序列微积分的切消结果是作为一种特殊情况出现的,即序列在右边的连续部分中最多有一个公式。因此,不需要对直觉自然演绎的归一化进行直接证明。在已发表的论文中,这种证明的唯一痕迹是一些可转换性,例如当一个隐含引入之后是一个隐含消除[1934-35,II.5.13]。直到1965年,达格·普拉维茨才找到了正规化的证明。另一个不太为人所知的证据也是在1965年由安德烈斯·拉乔提出的。我们在2005年2月发现了根岑论文的早期手写版本,与上面的标题完全相同,但内容却截然不同:最值得注意的是,它包含了对自然演绎标准体系的规范化的详细证明。手稿位于苏黎世eth的保罗·伯内斯收藏中,批号为Hs. 974: 271。伯内斯一定是在1933年4月因种族法律被逐出Göttingen之前就已经得到了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic was established in 1995 by the Association for Symbolic Logic to provide a journal of high standards that would be both accessible and of interest to as wide an audience as possible. It is designed to cover all areas within the purview of the ASL: mathematical logic and its applications, philosophical and non-classical logic and its applications, history and philosophy of logic, and philosophy and methodology of mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信