Comparison of the Expression of Antihypertensive Action of Preparation of Different Clinical and Pharmacological Groups

IF 0.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
V. Ivanna
{"title":"Comparison of the Expression of Antihypertensive Action of Preparation of Different Clinical and Pharmacological Groups","authors":"V. Ivanna","doi":"10.22377/ajp.v14i2.3624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Increased blood pressure (BP) is one of the most significant epidemiological, medical, social, and economic consequences of problems. The results of many studies indicate that in one-third of people in Ukraine, the level of BP exceeds 140/90 mm Hg, it is increased. There is a contradiction between the need to adhere to the current level of therapy, which involves the use of new, as a rule, expensive techniques and drugs, and the constant lack of funding for health care. Materials and Methods: Methods of statistical description, systematic, sociological, economic, and statistical analysis, including variational statistics, correspondence questionnaires, and expert assessments, were used in the research process. The study included 1568 patients diagnosed with hypertension. As a result of the pharmacoepidemiological analysis, it was shown that the most often antihypertensive monotherapy is performed for younger patients with initial lower BP values. Results: A more detailed analysis of the antihypertensive activity of drugs belonging to the main pharmacological groups was performed with arterial hypertension monotherapy. Therefore, it is important to analyze the therapeutic efficacy of antihypertensive drugs from different clinical and pharmacological groups, safety, and their impact on the wellbeing of patients. Discussion and Conclusion: Analysis of the structure of prescriptions revealed the dominant positions of Agriculture Commercialization Equity Fund drugs, and, above all, drugs enalapril, among patients with hypertension in all study groups, regardless of age and gender, as well as regimens of antihypertensive therapy. A retrospective study of the antihypertensive effect of drugs from different clinical and therapeutic groups revealed no significant differences, but significant differences were noted when comparing the original drugs with their reproduced analogs (generics)","PeriodicalId":8489,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22377/ajp.v14i2.3624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Increased blood pressure (BP) is one of the most significant epidemiological, medical, social, and economic consequences of problems. The results of many studies indicate that in one-third of people in Ukraine, the level of BP exceeds 140/90 mm Hg, it is increased. There is a contradiction between the need to adhere to the current level of therapy, which involves the use of new, as a rule, expensive techniques and drugs, and the constant lack of funding for health care. Materials and Methods: Methods of statistical description, systematic, sociological, economic, and statistical analysis, including variational statistics, correspondence questionnaires, and expert assessments, were used in the research process. The study included 1568 patients diagnosed with hypertension. As a result of the pharmacoepidemiological analysis, it was shown that the most often antihypertensive monotherapy is performed for younger patients with initial lower BP values. Results: A more detailed analysis of the antihypertensive activity of drugs belonging to the main pharmacological groups was performed with arterial hypertension monotherapy. Therefore, it is important to analyze the therapeutic efficacy of antihypertensive drugs from different clinical and pharmacological groups, safety, and their impact on the wellbeing of patients. Discussion and Conclusion: Analysis of the structure of prescriptions revealed the dominant positions of Agriculture Commercialization Equity Fund drugs, and, above all, drugs enalapril, among patients with hypertension in all study groups, regardless of age and gender, as well as regimens of antihypertensive therapy. A retrospective study of the antihypertensive effect of drugs from different clinical and therapeutic groups revealed no significant differences, but significant differences were noted when comparing the original drugs with their reproduced analogs (generics)
不同临床和药理学组制剂降压作用表达的比较
血压升高(BP)是最重要的流行病学、医学、社会和经济后果问题之一。许多研究结果表明,在乌克兰三分之一的人,血压水平超过140/90毫米汞柱,它是升高的。必须坚持目前的治疗水平,这通常涉及使用新的、昂贵的技术和药物,而保健资金不断缺乏,两者之间存在矛盾。材料与方法:在研究过程中使用了统计描述、系统、社会学、经济学和统计分析方法,包括变分统计、函电问卷调查和专家评估。该研究包括1568名被诊断为高血压的患者。药物流行病学分析的结果表明,最常见的降压单药治疗是针对初始血压值较低的年轻患者。结果:在动脉高血压单药治疗中,对主要药理组药物的降压活性进行了更详细的分析。因此,分析不同临床和药理组抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性及其对患者健康的影响具有重要意义。讨论与结论:处方结构分析显示,在所有研究组高血压患者中,不论年龄和性别,以及降压治疗方案中,农业商业化股权基金药物占主导地位,以依那普利药物占主导地位。对不同临床和治疗组药物的降压效果进行回顾性研究,结果显示无显著差异,但将原研药物与其复制类似物(仿制药)进行比较,发现有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of  Pharmaceutics
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Character of the publications: -Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology -Formulation Design and Development -Drug Discovery and Development Interface -Manufacturing Science and Engineering -Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism -Clinical Pharmacology, General Medicine and Translational Research -Physical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics -Novel Drug delivery system -Biotechnology & Microbiological evaluations -Regulatory Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信