O tema sexualidade humana nos livros didáticos de Biologia mais distribuídos pelo Programa Nacional do Livro Didático 2015

B. Ferreira, Luisa Aguiar Machado, Ana Júlia Pedreira
{"title":"O tema sexualidade humana nos livros didáticos de Biologia mais distribuídos pelo Programa Nacional do Livro Didático 2015","authors":"B. Ferreira, Luisa Aguiar Machado, Ana Júlia Pedreira","doi":"10.22294/EDUPERPPGEUFV.V11I..8726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The restriction of the approach to the issue of sexuality in schools and in the textbook may be problematic, since by not debating on contents related to human sexuality, important doubts about health in relation to the sexual sphere may not be clarified. By not debating about the social issues of human sexuality, prejudices and discriminations against homosexuals can be generated. The objective of this study was to investigate how the two collections of biology textbooks most distributed in Brazil in 2015, by the PNLD, address the theme, in addition to checking the collections of the same authors in 2018. Content analysis was used to analyze the four collections. It was verified that the language present in the textbooks still presents a heteronormative pattern, not addressing the diversity of human sexuality, focusing mainly on sexuality as a synonym and form of reproduction. Thus, the discussion of sexuality issues within the classroom should cover more topics within the content, in order to deepen the discussion and then be able to meet the criteria for building a democratic society. It is hoped that this study will contribute to the demystification of the taboos that involve human sexuality; as well as help in the elaboration of textbooks with a more social view of the sexuality theme, with the intention of deconstructing gender prejudices and sexual orientation.","PeriodicalId":31461,"journal":{"name":"Educacao em Perspectiva","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao em Perspectiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22294/EDUPERPPGEUFV.V11I..8726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The restriction of the approach to the issue of sexuality in schools and in the textbook may be problematic, since by not debating on contents related to human sexuality, important doubts about health in relation to the sexual sphere may not be clarified. By not debating about the social issues of human sexuality, prejudices and discriminations against homosexuals can be generated. The objective of this study was to investigate how the two collections of biology textbooks most distributed in Brazil in 2015, by the PNLD, address the theme, in addition to checking the collections of the same authors in 2018. Content analysis was used to analyze the four collections. It was verified that the language present in the textbooks still presents a heteronormative pattern, not addressing the diversity of human sexuality, focusing mainly on sexuality as a synonym and form of reproduction. Thus, the discussion of sexuality issues within the classroom should cover more topics within the content, in order to deepen the discussion and then be able to meet the criteria for building a democratic society. It is hoped that this study will contribute to the demystification of the taboos that involve human sexuality; as well as help in the elaboration of textbooks with a more social view of the sexuality theme, with the intention of deconstructing gender prejudices and sexual orientation.
2015年国家教科书计划分发最多的生物教科书中的人类性主题
在学校和教科书中对性问题的处理方式加以限制可能是有问题的,因为不就与人类性行为有关的内容进行辩论,可能无法澄清与性领域有关的健康方面的重要疑问。如果不讨论人类性行为的社会问题,就会产生对同性恋者的偏见和歧视。本研究的目的是调查2015年由PNLD在巴西发行最多的两本生物教科书如何解决这一主题,并检查2018年同一作者的收藏。采用内容分析法对四部藏书进行分析。经证实,教科书中的语言仍然呈现出一种异性恋的模式,不涉及人类性行为的多样性,主要侧重于性行为作为一种同义词和生殖形式。因此,课堂上对性问题的讨论应该在内容上涵盖更多的话题,以深化讨论,从而能够满足建设民主社会的标准。希望这项研究将有助于揭开涉及人类性行为的禁忌的神秘面纱;同时也有助于在教科书中对性主题有更社会的看法,意图解构性别偏见和性取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信