Is there an advantage of monitoring via exosome-based detection of EGFR mutations during treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients?

4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
E. Karagur, Aydın Demiray, N. Karagenç, E. Elver, O. Tokgun, A. Yaren, G. Dogu, H. Akça
{"title":"Is there an advantage of monitoring via exosome-based detection of EGFR mutations during treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients?","authors":"E. Karagur, Aydın Demiray, N. Karagenç, E. Elver, O. Tokgun, A. Yaren, G. Dogu, H. Akça","doi":"10.2298/gensr2301083k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We know that detection of EGFR mutations is very important for individual therapy. Nowadays FFPE samples are commonly using to detect the EGFR mutation status. But it has a few handicaps such as, tumor heterogeneity and non-repeatable, it is need to examine mutation statues of EGFR after each treatment regimen for individually treatment of NSCLC patients. Therefore, there is still need to develop non-invasive and useable over and over again approach for monitoring EGFR mutation statues and other genes for individual therapy. So, we aim to examine whether exosomes are good target for detection of EGFR mutation status or not. Pyrosequencing was used to detect, EGFR mutation in FFPE and exosome samples in some NSCLC patients. For the patients given different chemotherapy regime (n=28), PFS was evaluated before and after treatment. In patients who were EGFR positive before treatment, the median PFS for EGFR mutation-positive patients after treatment was 101.7 weeks (95% CI: 0.09-3.21), while for patients who were negative after treatment, the median PFS was 42.43 weeks (95% CI: 0.31- 10.52). Likewise, in patients who were EGFR negative before treatment and EGFR mutation negative after treatment, the PFS was median 52 weeks (95% CI: 0.17-2.84), while in patients who were positive after treatment, the median PFS was 27.57 weeks (95% CI: 0.35-5.58). We show that exosomes are good tools for monitoring EGFR mutation status and exosomes can be use as semi-invasive method for isolation of tumor DNAs for detection of mutation statues for individually treatment of NSCLC patients.","PeriodicalId":50423,"journal":{"name":"Genetika-Belgrade","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetika-Belgrade","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr2301083k","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We know that detection of EGFR mutations is very important for individual therapy. Nowadays FFPE samples are commonly using to detect the EGFR mutation status. But it has a few handicaps such as, tumor heterogeneity and non-repeatable, it is need to examine mutation statues of EGFR after each treatment regimen for individually treatment of NSCLC patients. Therefore, there is still need to develop non-invasive and useable over and over again approach for monitoring EGFR mutation statues and other genes for individual therapy. So, we aim to examine whether exosomes are good target for detection of EGFR mutation status or not. Pyrosequencing was used to detect, EGFR mutation in FFPE and exosome samples in some NSCLC patients. For the patients given different chemotherapy regime (n=28), PFS was evaluated before and after treatment. In patients who were EGFR positive before treatment, the median PFS for EGFR mutation-positive patients after treatment was 101.7 weeks (95% CI: 0.09-3.21), while for patients who were negative after treatment, the median PFS was 42.43 weeks (95% CI: 0.31- 10.52). Likewise, in patients who were EGFR negative before treatment and EGFR mutation negative after treatment, the PFS was median 52 weeks (95% CI: 0.17-2.84), while in patients who were positive after treatment, the median PFS was 27.57 weeks (95% CI: 0.35-5.58). We show that exosomes are good tools for monitoring EGFR mutation status and exosomes can be use as semi-invasive method for isolation of tumor DNAs for detection of mutation statues for individually treatment of NSCLC patients.
在非小细胞肺癌患者治疗期间,通过基于外泌体的EGFR突变检测进行监测是否有优势?
我们知道,检测EGFR突变对于个体化治疗非常重要。目前常用FFPE样品检测EGFR突变状态。但存在肿瘤异质性和不可重复等缺点,需要对NSCLC患者进行个体化治疗时,在各治疗方案后检测EGFR的突变状态。因此,仍然需要开发非侵入性和可反复使用的方法来监测EGFR突变状态和其他基因的个体治疗。因此,我们的目的是研究外泌体是否为检测EGFR突变状态的良好靶点。采用焦磷酸测序法检测部分NSCLC患者FFPE和外泌体样本中的EGFR突变。对给予不同化疗方案的患者(n=28),在治疗前后评估PFS。在治疗前EGFR阳性的患者中,治疗后EGFR突变阳性患者的中位PFS为101.7周(95% CI: 0.09-3.21),而治疗后阴性患者的中位PFS为42.43周(95% CI: 0.31- 10.52)。同样,在治疗前EGFR阴性和治疗后EGFR突变阴性的患者中,PFS中位数为52周(95% CI: 0.17-2.84),而在治疗后阳性的患者中,PFS中位数为27.57周(95% CI: 0.35-5.58)。我们发现外泌体是监测EGFR突变状态的良好工具,外泌体可以作为半侵入性方法用于分离肿瘤dna以检测突变状态,从而对非小细胞肺癌患者进行个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetika-Belgrade
Genetika-Belgrade AGRONOMY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The GENETIKA is dedicated to genetic studies of all organisms including genetics of microorganisms, plant genetics, animal genetics, human genetics, molecular genetics, genomics, functional genomics, plant and animal breeding, population and evolutionary genetics, mutagenesis and genotoxicology and biotechnology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信