{"title":"Commerce Clause Questions After Morrison: Some Observations on the New Formalism and the New Realism","authors":"Joshua A. Klein","doi":"10.2307/1229598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN TRO D U CTIO N 57 1 I. REALISM AND FORMALISM IN PAST AND PRESENT COMMERCE CASES 574 A. The Historical Rise of the Realism/Formalism Dichotomy in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence 574 B. The Realist Approach Motivating Lopez and Morrison 576 C. Formal Commerce Rules in Morrison and Lopez 578 II. How PRECEDENT ON CHANNELS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES UNDERCUTS THE PRINCIPLES MOTIVATING MORRISON AND LOPEZ 584 A. The Broad Reach of the Power to Regulate Instrumentalities 584 B. The Breadth of the Power to Regulate Persons or Things in Interstate Commerce 590 C. An Invitation to Artful Legislating 594 III. WHAT'S THE POINT OF EVADABLE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 596 A. The Problem with a Realist Response 597 B. Why a Formalist Response Might Work Better 601 C O N CLU SIO N 604","PeriodicalId":51386,"journal":{"name":"Stanford Law Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"571-606"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1229598","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229598","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
IN TRO D U CTIO N 57 1 I. REALISM AND FORMALISM IN PAST AND PRESENT COMMERCE CASES 574 A. The Historical Rise of the Realism/Formalism Dichotomy in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence 574 B. The Realist Approach Motivating Lopez and Morrison 576 C. Formal Commerce Rules in Morrison and Lopez 578 II. How PRECEDENT ON CHANNELS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES UNDERCUTS THE PRINCIPLES MOTIVATING MORRISON AND LOPEZ 584 A. The Broad Reach of the Power to Regulate Instrumentalities 584 B. The Breadth of the Power to Regulate Persons or Things in Interstate Commerce 590 C. An Invitation to Artful Legislating 594 III. WHAT'S THE POINT OF EVADABLE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 596 A. The Problem with a Realist Response 597 B. Why a Formalist Response Might Work Better 601 C O N CLU SIO N 604
1 .过去和现在商业案件中的现实主义和形式主义。商业条款法学中现实主义/形式主义二分法的历史兴起[74]B.现实主义方法激励洛佩兹和莫里森[76]C.莫里森和洛佩兹的正式商业规则[78]渠道和工具上的先例如何削弱了激励莫里森和洛佩兹的原则。B.在州际贸易中管制人或物的权力的广度C.对巧妙立法的邀请逃避宪法的意义是什么?596 A。现实主义反应的问题B.为什么形式主义的反应可能会更好C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C . C