Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) as biodiversity indicators for assessing urban forest habitats

IF 0.3 Q4 FORESTRY
M. de Groot, P. Simončič, Andrej Verlič, U. Vilhar
{"title":"Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) as biodiversity indicators for assessing urban forest habitats","authors":"M. de Groot, P. Simončič, Andrej Verlič, U. Vilhar","doi":"10.20315/asetl.129.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban and peri-urban forests are important habitats for maintaining biodiversity in cities. In this paper, we report a method for using hoverflies as biodiversity indicators in urban forest habitats. As a case study, forest habitats in three peri-urban and urban forests were assessed and compared to rural forests in Slovenia. Rožnik (Ljubljana) was chosen as the urban forest site, Mestni log (Ljubljana) and Brdo (Kranj) were chosen as the peri-urban sites, and eight sites were chosen in rural forests in different ecoregions in Slovenia. Forest hoverfly species richness and the species composition of different biological traits were compared between the peri-urban forests, urban forest and rural forest sites. In addition, species richness was assessed for changes in response to weather conditions between years. The number of species with the investigated traits in the urban and peri-urban forests was within the range of the number of species observed in the rural forests. The number of saproxylic species was higher in the urban forest but lower in the peri-urban forests compared to the rural forests. The proportions of species with different feeding modes and different development times were similar between the peri-urban, urban and rural forests. The proportions of species with development times of less than 2 months or more than 1 year and of predatory species were similar in the urban and peri-urban forests but higher in the rural forests. The species composition of the other biological traits differed between the peri-urban, urban and rural forests. Species richness and abundance displayed large differences in phenological patterns between 2012 and 2013; these differences are related to differences in the minimum temperature for these years. The results are discussed in relation to forest management in urban forests, the usefulness of hoverflies as a biodiversity indicator and possible extrapolation to other species groups.","PeriodicalId":7188,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvae et Ligni","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvae et Ligni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20315/asetl.129.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban and peri-urban forests are important habitats for maintaining biodiversity in cities. In this paper, we report a method for using hoverflies as biodiversity indicators in urban forest habitats. As a case study, forest habitats in three peri-urban and urban forests were assessed and compared to rural forests in Slovenia. Rožnik (Ljubljana) was chosen as the urban forest site, Mestni log (Ljubljana) and Brdo (Kranj) were chosen as the peri-urban sites, and eight sites were chosen in rural forests in different ecoregions in Slovenia. Forest hoverfly species richness and the species composition of different biological traits were compared between the peri-urban forests, urban forest and rural forest sites. In addition, species richness was assessed for changes in response to weather conditions between years. The number of species with the investigated traits in the urban and peri-urban forests was within the range of the number of species observed in the rural forests. The number of saproxylic species was higher in the urban forest but lower in the peri-urban forests compared to the rural forests. The proportions of species with different feeding modes and different development times were similar between the peri-urban, urban and rural forests. The proportions of species with development times of less than 2 months or more than 1 year and of predatory species were similar in the urban and peri-urban forests but higher in the rural forests. The species composition of the other biological traits differed between the peri-urban, urban and rural forests. Species richness and abundance displayed large differences in phenological patterns between 2012 and 2013; these differences are related to differences in the minimum temperature for these years. The results are discussed in relation to forest management in urban forests, the usefulness of hoverflies as a biodiversity indicator and possible extrapolation to other species groups.
食蚜蝇(双翅目:食蚜科)作为城市森林生境生物多样性评价指标
城市和城郊森林是维持城市生物多样性的重要生境。本文报道了一种利用食蚜蝇作为城市森林生境生物多样性指标的方法。作为一项个案研究,评估了三个城市近郊森林和城市森林的森林生境,并与斯洛文尼亚的农村森林进行了比较。城市森林站点选择Rožnik(卢布尔雅那),城市周边站点选择Mestni log(卢布尔雅那)和Brdo (Kranj),并在斯洛文尼亚不同生态区域的农村森林中选择了8个站点。比较了城市近郊森林、城市森林和农村森林样地的森林食蚜蝇物种丰富度和不同生物性状的物种组成。此外,还评估了物种丰富度对不同年份气候条件的响应变化。城市和城郊森林中具有上述特征的物种数量与农村森林中具有上述特征的物种数量基本一致。与农村森林相比,城市森林的腐木类物种数量较多,而城郊森林的腐木类物种数量较少。不同取食方式和不同发育时间的物种比例在城郊、城市和乡村森林中相似。城市和城郊森林中发育期小于2个月或大于1年的物种和掠食性物种的比例相似,但农村森林中较高。其他生物学性状的物种组成在城市近郊、城市和农村森林之间存在差异。物种丰富度和丰度在物候格局上表现出较大差异;这些差异与这些年来最低气温的差异有关。讨论了城市森林的森林管理、食蚜蝇作为生物多样性指标的有效性以及对其他类群的可能外推。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
2
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信