The Impact of Marijuana Legalization on Youth and The Need for State Legislation on Marijuana-Specific Instruction in K-12 Schools

Amanda Harmon Cooley
{"title":"The Impact of Marijuana Legalization on Youth and The Need for State Legislation on Marijuana-Specific Instruction in K-12 Schools","authors":"Amanda Harmon Cooley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2710124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State legalization of marijuana is a divisive and polarizing issue that has resulted in fragmentation between governments and citizens. In contravention of federal law, voters in Colorado and Washington in 2012 and voters in Alaska and Oregon in 2014 approved ballot initiatives that legalized the state-regulated sale of marijuana to adults for their recreational use and possession. All of these measures continue to make marijuana unlawful for anyone under twenty-one, which is reflective of the shared understanding of the myriad harms that occur when non-adults access marijuana. Based on this understanding, this Article argues that any state that fully legalizes marijuana has a concomitant duty to amend its K-12 public school drug and alcohol instructional statutes to explicitly include marijuana education. Although none of these four states has enacted such legislation, this Article provides two, straightforward and necessary statutory alternatives to do so. These statutes would provide the predicate for the development of correlative marijuana-specific educational regulations and academic content standards in these states. This legislation is necessary as alternative current attempts to educate about marijuana in these states do not provide sufficient safeguards for their youth. Additionally, this legislation will help to ease the fracturing between federal and state governments as it would expressly comply with the federal funding conditions of the recent 2015 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Due to the Rawlsian overlapping consensus about the need to prohibit non-adult access to marijuana, this statutory amendment would not require a herculean political effort and could be a bridge between the partisan opponents on the issue of marijuana reforms. These legislative actions could also provide a model for future states that may legalize marijuana in the future. Finally, by enacting these statutes, these states will take strides to cure a significant legal deficiency that has the potential to cause irreparable harm to their children and greater populaces.","PeriodicalId":82287,"journal":{"name":"Pepperdine law review","volume":"44 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pepperdine law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2710124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

State legalization of marijuana is a divisive and polarizing issue that has resulted in fragmentation between governments and citizens. In contravention of federal law, voters in Colorado and Washington in 2012 and voters in Alaska and Oregon in 2014 approved ballot initiatives that legalized the state-regulated sale of marijuana to adults for their recreational use and possession. All of these measures continue to make marijuana unlawful for anyone under twenty-one, which is reflective of the shared understanding of the myriad harms that occur when non-adults access marijuana. Based on this understanding, this Article argues that any state that fully legalizes marijuana has a concomitant duty to amend its K-12 public school drug and alcohol instructional statutes to explicitly include marijuana education. Although none of these four states has enacted such legislation, this Article provides two, straightforward and necessary statutory alternatives to do so. These statutes would provide the predicate for the development of correlative marijuana-specific educational regulations and academic content standards in these states. This legislation is necessary as alternative current attempts to educate about marijuana in these states do not provide sufficient safeguards for their youth. Additionally, this legislation will help to ease the fracturing between federal and state governments as it would expressly comply with the federal funding conditions of the recent 2015 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Due to the Rawlsian overlapping consensus about the need to prohibit non-adult access to marijuana, this statutory amendment would not require a herculean political effort and could be a bridge between the partisan opponents on the issue of marijuana reforms. These legislative actions could also provide a model for future states that may legalize marijuana in the future. Finally, by enacting these statutes, these states will take strides to cure a significant legal deficiency that has the potential to cause irreparable harm to their children and greater populaces.
大麻合法化对青少年的影响以及州立法对K-12学校大麻专项教育的必要性
国家大麻合法化是一个分裂和两极分化的问题,导致政府和公民之间的分裂。2012年,科罗拉多州和华盛顿州的选民,以及2014年阿拉斯加州和俄勒冈州的选民,违反联邦法律,通过了一项投票倡议,使该州规定的向成年人出售用于娱乐用途和持有的大麻合法化。所有这些措施继续使21岁以下的任何人吸食大麻都是非法的,这反映了人们对非成年人吸食大麻所带来的无数危害的共同理解。基于这种理解,本文认为,任何将大麻完全合法化的州都有责任修改其K-12公立学校的毒品和酒精教学法规,明确将大麻教育纳入其中。尽管上述四个州均未制定此类立法,但本条提供了两种直接且必要的法定替代方案。这些法规将为这些州制定相关的大麻特定教育法规和学术内容标准提供前提。这项立法是必要的,因为目前在这些州进行大麻教育的尝试并没有为他们的年轻人提供足够的保障。此外,这项立法将有助于缓解联邦政府和州政府之间的分歧,因为它明确符合最近2015年1965年《中小学教育法》重新授权的联邦资金条件。由于罗尔斯在禁止非成年人接触大麻的必要性上达成了重叠共识,这项法定修正案不需要付出巨大的政治努力,可以在大麻改革问题上成为党派反对者之间的桥梁。这些立法行动也可以为未来可能使大麻合法化的州提供一个模式。最后,通过颁布这些法规,这些州将在弥补一个重大的法律缺陷方面迈出大步,这个缺陷可能会对他们的孩子和更多的民众造成无法弥补的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信