Changes in Pharmacy Students After Experiencing Interprofessional Education Activities

Shane Tolleson, N. Ismail, Anne C. Gill, R. D. Stritto, M. Hatfield, C. Teal, E. Nelson, C. Hatfield
{"title":"Changes in Pharmacy Students After Experiencing Interprofessional Education Activities","authors":"Shane Tolleson, N. Ismail, Anne C. Gill, R. D. Stritto, M. Hatfield, C. Teal, E. Nelson, C. Hatfield","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2016V6N1A222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Interprofessional education (IPE) has become increasingly important among healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of IPE experiences on pharmacy students’ perceived level of comfort with and level of reliability regarding other healthcare professionals . Methods and Findings : A survey of third- and fourth-year pharmacy students ( N = 190) was analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to address the study objectives. Students experienced a significant increase in their level of comfort with questioning other professions after IPE (pre IPE: 5.45 ± 2.24 and post IPE: 7.22 ± 1.62, p <0.01) and being questioned by other professions (pre IPE: 5.39 ± 2.24 and post IPE: 7.04 ± 1.68, p <0.01). Students also experienced a significant increase in the perceived reliability and accuracy of information from nurses after IPE (pre IPE: 5.91 ± 1.82 and post IPE: 6.41 ± 1.62, p = 0.01). Conclusions : Pharmacy students who experienced any IPE perceived themselves as more comfortable with questioning and being questioned by other healthcare professionals than students without IPE. Additional research is needed to more clearly define the benefits of IPE and how it should be designed.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2016V6N1A222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background : Interprofessional education (IPE) has become increasingly important among healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of IPE experiences on pharmacy students’ perceived level of comfort with and level of reliability regarding other healthcare professionals . Methods and Findings : A survey of third- and fourth-year pharmacy students ( N = 190) was analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to address the study objectives. Students experienced a significant increase in their level of comfort with questioning other professions after IPE (pre IPE: 5.45 ± 2.24 and post IPE: 7.22 ± 1.62, p <0.01) and being questioned by other professions (pre IPE: 5.39 ± 2.24 and post IPE: 7.04 ± 1.68, p <0.01). Students also experienced a significant increase in the perceived reliability and accuracy of information from nurses after IPE (pre IPE: 5.91 ± 1.82 and post IPE: 6.41 ± 1.62, p = 0.01). Conclusions : Pharmacy students who experienced any IPE perceived themselves as more comfortable with questioning and being questioned by other healthcare professionals than students without IPE. Additional research is needed to more clearly define the benefits of IPE and how it should be designed.
经历跨专业教育活动后药学专业学生的变化
背景:跨专业教育(IPE)在医疗保健专业人员中变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是评估IPE经历对药学学生对其他医疗保健专业人员的感知舒适水平和可靠性水平的影响。方法与发现:采用描述性统计和双变量分析对190名药学三、四年级学生进行调查。学生在接受其他专业提问时的舒适度(前:5.45±2.24,后:7.22±1.62,p <0.01)和被其他专业提问时的舒适度(前:5.39±2.24,后:7.04±1.68,p <0.01)均有显著提高。学生对护士信息的感知可靠性和准确性也显著提高(术前:5.91±1.82,术后:6.41±1.62,p = 0.01)。结论:经历过IPE的药学专业学生比没有经历过IPE的学生更能适应被其他医疗专业人员质疑和被质疑。需要更多的研究来更清楚地定义IPE的好处以及应该如何设计它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书