Interprofessional Collaboration in Addressing Diet as a Common Risk Factor: A Qualitative Study

Hwee Hsia Ong, C. C. Wan, Xiaoli Gao
{"title":"Interprofessional Collaboration in Addressing Diet as a Common Risk Factor: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Hwee Hsia Ong, C. C. Wan, Xiaoli Gao","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2015V5N2A215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Unhealthy diet is a common risk factor threatening dental and general health. Conflicting dietary advice persists among different healthcare professions, despite some shared goals, causing mystification to patients and the public. This qualitative study aimed to understand the perspectives of dentists, physicians, and dietitians in targeting unhealthy diet as a common risk factor, their experiences and barriers in addressing conflicting dietary advice, and possible ways for improving cross-professional coordination. Methods and Findings: A purposive sample of 40 dentists, physicians, and dieticians was recruited from different service sectors and joined in semi-structured interviews, which were subjected to thematic content analysis. Participants supported the common risk factor approach and suggested improving cross-professional cooperation by maximizing potentials of multidisciplinary care, engaging auxiliary/allied staff, refining electronic systems, and incorporating cutting-edge communication technologies. Inconsistent dietary advice stemmed from different treatment focuses and lack of mutual understanding and well-followed guidelines. Inconsistencies can be resolved by striking a balance for the patient’s best interest, well-informing patients, respecting patients’ autonomy, acquiring cross-professional knowledge, and conforming to shared guidelines. Conclusions: Views solicited from three healthcare professions endorsed the importance of cross-professional partnership in preventing/managing dietrelated health problems. Educators, professional bodies, and administrators share the responsibility to dispel conflicting health messages and promote better practice in dietary counselling.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2015V5N2A215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Unhealthy diet is a common risk factor threatening dental and general health. Conflicting dietary advice persists among different healthcare professions, despite some shared goals, causing mystification to patients and the public. This qualitative study aimed to understand the perspectives of dentists, physicians, and dietitians in targeting unhealthy diet as a common risk factor, their experiences and barriers in addressing conflicting dietary advice, and possible ways for improving cross-professional coordination. Methods and Findings: A purposive sample of 40 dentists, physicians, and dieticians was recruited from different service sectors and joined in semi-structured interviews, which were subjected to thematic content analysis. Participants supported the common risk factor approach and suggested improving cross-professional cooperation by maximizing potentials of multidisciplinary care, engaging auxiliary/allied staff, refining electronic systems, and incorporating cutting-edge communication technologies. Inconsistent dietary advice stemmed from different treatment focuses and lack of mutual understanding and well-followed guidelines. Inconsistencies can be resolved by striking a balance for the patient’s best interest, well-informing patients, respecting patients’ autonomy, acquiring cross-professional knowledge, and conforming to shared guidelines. Conclusions: Views solicited from three healthcare professions endorsed the importance of cross-professional partnership in preventing/managing dietrelated health problems. Educators, professional bodies, and administrators share the responsibility to dispel conflicting health messages and promote better practice in dietary counselling.
跨专业合作解决饮食作为一个共同的风险因素:一项定性研究
背景:不健康的饮食是威胁牙齿和全身健康的常见危险因素。尽管有一些共同的目标,但不同的医疗保健专业仍然存在相互矛盾的饮食建议,这给患者和公众带来了困惑。本定性研究旨在了解牙医、医生和营养师在将不健康饮食作为常见风险因素方面的观点,他们在解决相互矛盾的饮食建议方面的经验和障碍,以及改善跨专业协调的可能方法。方法和发现:从不同的服务行业招募40名牙医、内科医生和营养师,进行半结构化访谈,并对其进行主题内容分析。与会者支持共同风险因素方法,并建议通过最大限度地发挥多学科护理潜力、聘用辅助/联合人员、完善电子系统和采用尖端通信技术来改善跨专业合作。不一致的饮食建议源于不同的治疗重点和缺乏相互理解和严格遵循的指导方针。不一致可以通过平衡患者的最佳利益、充分告知患者、尊重患者的自主权、获取跨专业知识和遵守共同的指导方针来解决。结论:从三个医疗保健专业收集的意见支持跨专业伙伴关系在预防/管理与饮食有关的健康问题方面的重要性。教育工作者、专业机构和管理人员都有责任消除相互矛盾的健康信息,促进更好的饮食咨询实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书