"Walking the Walk”: Promoting Competencies for Interprofessional Learning through Team Meetings—A Case Study

M. Links
{"title":"\"Walking the Walk”: Promoting Competencies for Interprofessional Learning through Team Meetings—A Case Study","authors":"M. Links","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2014V4N2A145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interprofessional learning is a key aspect of improving team-based healthcare. Core competencies for interprofessional education (IPE) activities have recently been developed, but there is a lack of guidance as to practical application. Methods and Findings: Cancer Forum is a weekly multi-professional meeting used as the case study for this report. Power was identified as a critical issue and six questions were identified as the basis for a structured reflection on the conduct of Cancer Forum. Results were then synthesised using Habermas’ delineation of learning as instrumental, normative, communicative, dramaturgical, and emancipatory. Power was a key issue in identified obstacles to inter professional learning. Leadership emerged as a cross-cutting theme and was added as a seventh question. The emancipatory potential of interprofessional learning benefited from explicit consideration of the meeting agenda to promote competencies of sharing role knowledge, teamwork and communication. Modelling of required skills fulfils a dramaturgical and normative role. Conclusions : The structured reflection tool highlighted the relationship between power and IPE competencies. It was essential to walk the walk as well as talk. The process followed provides a practical guide for using team meetings to promote interprofessional learning competencies and thereby improving patient care. Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2014V4N2A145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional learning is a key aspect of improving team-based healthcare. Core competencies for interprofessional education (IPE) activities have recently been developed, but there is a lack of guidance as to practical application. Methods and Findings: Cancer Forum is a weekly multi-professional meeting used as the case study for this report. Power was identified as a critical issue and six questions were identified as the basis for a structured reflection on the conduct of Cancer Forum. Results were then synthesised using Habermas’ delineation of learning as instrumental, normative, communicative, dramaturgical, and emancipatory. Power was a key issue in identified obstacles to inter professional learning. Leadership emerged as a cross-cutting theme and was added as a seventh question. The emancipatory potential of interprofessional learning benefited from explicit consideration of the meeting agenda to promote competencies of sharing role knowledge, teamwork and communication. Modelling of required skills fulfils a dramaturgical and normative role. Conclusions : The structured reflection tool highlighted the relationship between power and IPE competencies. It was essential to walk the walk as well as talk. The process followed provides a practical guide for using team meetings to promote interprofessional learning competencies and thereby improving patient care. Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE
“付诸行动”:通过团队会议提升跨专业学习的能力——一个案例研究
背景:跨专业学习是改善团队医疗保健的一个关键方面。跨专业教育(IPE)活动的核心竞争力最近得到了发展,但缺乏实际应用的指导。方法和发现:癌症论坛是一个每周的多专业会议,被用作本报告的案例研究。权力被确定为一个关键问题,并确定了六个问题,作为对癌症论坛进行结构化反思的基础。然后,利用哈贝马斯对学习的描述,将结果综合为工具性、规范性、交际性、戏剧性和解放性。权力是确定跨专业学习障碍的关键问题。领导力作为一个跨领域的主题出现,并被增加为第七个问题。跨专业学习的解放潜力得益于对会议议程的明确考虑,以促进分享角色知识、团队合作和沟通的能力。所需技能的建模具有戏剧性和规范性的作用。结论:结构化反思工具强调了权力与IPE能力之间的关系。说到做到是很重要的。接下来的过程为使用团队会议来促进跨专业学习能力从而改善患者护理提供了实用指南。正常0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书