Law and Psychiatry Seminar: An Advanced Intervention in Interprofessional Education and Attitudinal Improvement

M. Mela, K. Trinder, Glen Luther, M. D'Eon
{"title":"Law and Psychiatry Seminar: An Advanced Intervention in Interprofessional Education and Attitudinal Improvement","authors":"M. Mela, K. Trinder, Glen Luther, M. D'Eon","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N2A105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The tenuous relationship between psychiatrists and lawyers does not serve mental health patients in conflict with the law or society well. The characteristic miscommunication that occurs, though premised on differential pedagogical constructs, presents an opportunity to intervene from the pre-licensure educationalstage with the hope of positively affecting future practice. Methods: Law students and psychiatric residents were brought together to interact with each other and with instructors from the two fields through the Law and Psychiatry interprofessional seminar series. We examined the attitudes and perceived co-operation of learners in this seminar in comparison to a control group of law students (Human Rights class) who did not have any interprofessional interaction. Findings: Learners in the interprofessional seminar series reported more positive attitudes toward members of the other profession after completing the course. Additional positive changes in the level of perception of and actual co-operation with the other profession were noted with high satisfaction among participants. Conclusions: Learning activities that can foster positive interactions with and understanding of other professions may improve relations and collaboration in interprofessional education. The potential impact and benefit for the patient and the system are worthwhile. 72 1024x768 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N2A105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The tenuous relationship between psychiatrists and lawyers does not serve mental health patients in conflict with the law or society well. The characteristic miscommunication that occurs, though premised on differential pedagogical constructs, presents an opportunity to intervene from the pre-licensure educationalstage with the hope of positively affecting future practice. Methods: Law students and psychiatric residents were brought together to interact with each other and with instructors from the two fields through the Law and Psychiatry interprofessional seminar series. We examined the attitudes and perceived co-operation of learners in this seminar in comparison to a control group of law students (Human Rights class) who did not have any interprofessional interaction. Findings: Learners in the interprofessional seminar series reported more positive attitudes toward members of the other profession after completing the course. Additional positive changes in the level of perception of and actual co-operation with the other profession were noted with high satisfaction among participants. Conclusions: Learning activities that can foster positive interactions with and understanding of other professions may improve relations and collaboration in interprofessional education. The potential impact and benefit for the patient and the system are worthwhile. 72 1024x768 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
法律和精神病学研讨会:跨专业教育和态度改善的高级干预
背景:精神科医生和律师之间脆弱的关系不能很好地服务与法律或社会冲突的精神健康患者。虽然以不同的教学结构为前提,但发生的典型误解提供了一个机会,可以从执照前教育阶段进行干预,希望对未来的实践产生积极影响。方法:通过法学和精神病学跨专业系列研讨会,将法学学生和精神病学住院医师聚集在一起,相互交流,并与来自两个领域的讲师进行互动。我们检查了在这个研讨会上的学习者的态度和感知合作,并与没有任何专业间互动的法律学生(人权课)的对照组进行了比较。研究结果:参加跨专业系列研讨会的学习者在完成课程后对其他专业的成员持更积极的态度。参与者对其他专业的认知和实际合作水平也有了积极的变化,他们对其他专业的满意度很高。结论:能够促进与其他专业的积极互动和理解的学习活动可以改善跨专业教育中的关系和合作。对患者和系统的潜在影响和益处是值得的。72 1024 × 768正常0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书