Tutor Experiences with Facilitating Interprofessional Problem-Based Learning

Lisa M. Jewell, M. D'Eon, Nora McKee, P. Proctor, K. Trinder
{"title":"Tutor Experiences with Facilitating Interprofessional Problem-Based Learning","authors":"Lisa M. Jewell, M. D'Eon, Nora McKee, P. Proctor, K. Trinder","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N2A100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article describes tutors’ experiences with facilitating interprofessional problem-based learning (iPBL), a topic rarely discussed in the literature. We examined tutors’ perceptions of what it was like to tutor iPBL, including the rewarding and challenging aspects. We also reported differences between new and experienced tutors. Methods and Findings: The data presented in this article were collected using three versions of a paper-and-pencil survey (N = 77, N = 99, and N = 97 for each version of the survey, respectively) and six focus groups. Surveys were completed at the conclusion of iPBL modules. Both quantitative and qualitative results indicated that tutors found the experience of facilitating iPBL to be rewarding and encountered few challenges. Tutors felt the training they received prepared them well to tutor. They also felt that facilitating iPBL increased their knowledge in the topic area of the iPBL module and of other professional roles, that it enhanced their skills as facilitators, and that they enjoyed observing students learn. New tutors reported significantly more learning and skill development than experienced tutors. Conclusions: Four lessons were derived from our research: 1) use iPBL to offer IPE; 2) invest in tutor training and support; 3) help tutors trust the process; and 4) consider tutor recruitment and retention strategies.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N2A100","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N2A100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: This article describes tutors’ experiences with facilitating interprofessional problem-based learning (iPBL), a topic rarely discussed in the literature. We examined tutors’ perceptions of what it was like to tutor iPBL, including the rewarding and challenging aspects. We also reported differences between new and experienced tutors. Methods and Findings: The data presented in this article were collected using three versions of a paper-and-pencil survey (N = 77, N = 99, and N = 97 for each version of the survey, respectively) and six focus groups. Surveys were completed at the conclusion of iPBL modules. Both quantitative and qualitative results indicated that tutors found the experience of facilitating iPBL to be rewarding and encountered few challenges. Tutors felt the training they received prepared them well to tutor. They also felt that facilitating iPBL increased their knowledge in the topic area of the iPBL module and of other professional roles, that it enhanced their skills as facilitators, and that they enjoyed observing students learn. New tutors reported significantly more learning and skill development than experienced tutors. Conclusions: Four lessons were derived from our research: 1) use iPBL to offer IPE; 2) invest in tutor training and support; 3) help tutors trust the process; and 4) consider tutor recruitment and retention strategies.
导师经验,促进跨专业的基于问题的学习
背景:本文描述了导师在促进跨专业基于问题的学习(iPBL)方面的经验,这是一个在文献中很少讨论的话题。我们调查了导师对辅导iPBL的看法,包括回报和挑战两个方面。我们还报告了新导师和有经验导师之间的差异。方法和发现:本文中提供的数据是通过三种版本的纸笔调查(每种版本的调查分别为N = 77, N = 99和N = 97)和六个焦点小组收集的。调查在iPBL模块结束时完成。定量和定性结果都表明,导师认为促进iPBL的经验是有益的,遇到的挑战很少。导师们认为他们接受的培训为他们做家教做好了准备。他们还认为,促进iPBL增加了他们在iPBL模块的主题领域和其他专业角色方面的知识,提高了他们作为促进者的技能,并且他们喜欢观察学生的学习。与经验丰富的导师相比,新导师的学习和技能发展明显更好。结论:本研究得出以下四点启示:1)利用iPBL提供IPE;2)投资导师培训和支持;3)帮助导师信任这个过程;4)考虑导师招聘和保留策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书