Physician and Nurse Perspectives of an Interprofessional and Integrated Primary Care-Based Program for Seniors

Ainsley Moore, Kalpana Nair, C. Patterson, Joy White, Shelly T. House, Amjed Kadhim-Saleh, J. Riva
{"title":"Physician and Nurse Perspectives of an Interprofessional and Integrated Primary Care-Based Program for Seniors","authors":"Ainsley Moore, Kalpana Nair, C. Patterson, Joy White, Shelly T. House, Amjed Kadhim-Saleh, J. Riva","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N1A95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Canada, primary care practitioners provide the majority of care for elderly patients. Increasing volume and complexity of care compounded by a shortage of specialized geriatric services has lead to problems of fragmented, inefficient,and often ineffective service for this population. Integrated models that bridge primary and secondary care have emerged as a major theme in health reform to address such challenges for care of the elderly. Although primary care practitioners are important stakeholders necessary for successful uptake and sustainability of such integrated models, this perspective has been largely unexplore d. Methods and Findings: We used a qualitative thematic approach to bring forward front-line perspectives of nurses and physicians who referred their patients to a newly developed integrated, multidisciplinary program for seniors that was introduced into their primary care clinic. Referrers experienced improved care processes, improved quality of care, as well as an enhanced experience when managing their elderly patients. Unclear assignment of roles and responsibilities created confusion for referring practitioners and their patients. Conclusions : Understanding benefits, limitations, and changes to front-line practitioner experience provides insight into important factors contributing to buy-in and sustainability of integrated programming for the elderly in this setting.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N1A95","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2013V3N1A95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: In Canada, primary care practitioners provide the majority of care for elderly patients. Increasing volume and complexity of care compounded by a shortage of specialized geriatric services has lead to problems of fragmented, inefficient,and often ineffective service for this population. Integrated models that bridge primary and secondary care have emerged as a major theme in health reform to address such challenges for care of the elderly. Although primary care practitioners are important stakeholders necessary for successful uptake and sustainability of such integrated models, this perspective has been largely unexplore d. Methods and Findings: We used a qualitative thematic approach to bring forward front-line perspectives of nurses and physicians who referred their patients to a newly developed integrated, multidisciplinary program for seniors that was introduced into their primary care clinic. Referrers experienced improved care processes, improved quality of care, as well as an enhanced experience when managing their elderly patients. Unclear assignment of roles and responsibilities created confusion for referring practitioners and their patients. Conclusions : Understanding benefits, limitations, and changes to front-line practitioner experience provides insight into important factors contributing to buy-in and sustainability of integrated programming for the elderly in this setting.
医师和护士对老年人跨专业综合初级保健计划的看法
背景:在加拿大,初级保健医生为老年患者提供了大部分护理。护理的数量和复杂性不断增加,加上专门老年服务的短缺,导致对这一人口的服务分散、效率低下,而且往往无效。连接初级和二级保健的综合模式已成为卫生改革的一个主要主题,以应对老年人护理方面的这些挑战。尽管初级保健从业者是成功吸收和可持续发展这种综合模式所必需的重要利益相关者,但这一观点在很大程度上尚未得到探索。方法和发现:我们使用定性主题方法,提出了护士和医生的一线观点,他们将患者转介到初级保健诊所引入的新开发的综合多学科老年人项目。转诊经历了改进的护理过程,提高了护理质量,以及在管理老年患者时增强了经验。不明确的角色和职责分配给转诊医生和他们的病人造成了混乱。结论:了解一线从业人员经验的好处、局限性和变化,有助于深入了解在这种情况下为老年人提供综合规划的支持和可持续性的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书