Building better relationships: developing critically reflective practice when working preventively with domestic violence and abuse

J. Das, Craft Training, K. Waddington
{"title":"Building better relationships: developing critically reflective practice when working preventively with domestic violence and abuse","authors":"J. Das, Craft Training, K. Waddington","doi":"10.19043/ipdj.102.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and context: This article presents reflections on critical participatory action research into the development of critically reflective practice, conducted by the first author alongside practitioners who work preventively in the field of domestic violence and abuse. It is part of a doctorate in health science undertaken in response to the need to question assumptions, presuppositions and meaning perspectives in what is a complex and harmful area of interprofessional practice. Aims: The research aims are to develop knowledge and professional/interprofessional practice in this ill-defined area of practice in two phases – phase 1: creating opportunities for interprofessional critical reflection; and phase 2: examining the impact this has on individual and collective practice. This article offers an emerging framework for critically reflective interprofessional practice, and critical reflections on phase 1 of the study, from the perspective of insider/practitioner/researcher, through the lenses of sincerity and significance in qualitative research. Implications for practice: The article concludes by proposing potentially important implications for practice development in the following areas: Interprofessional practice The conditions required for developing critically reflective practice How we reveal, understand and work with power dynamics when working with conflict, violence and abuse","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.102.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and context: This article presents reflections on critical participatory action research into the development of critically reflective practice, conducted by the first author alongside practitioners who work preventively in the field of domestic violence and abuse. It is part of a doctorate in health science undertaken in response to the need to question assumptions, presuppositions and meaning perspectives in what is a complex and harmful area of interprofessional practice. Aims: The research aims are to develop knowledge and professional/interprofessional practice in this ill-defined area of practice in two phases – phase 1: creating opportunities for interprofessional critical reflection; and phase 2: examining the impact this has on individual and collective practice. This article offers an emerging framework for critically reflective interprofessional practice, and critical reflections on phase 1 of the study, from the perspective of insider/practitioner/researcher, through the lenses of sincerity and significance in qualitative research. Implications for practice: The article concludes by proposing potentially important implications for practice development in the following areas: Interprofessional practice The conditions required for developing critically reflective practice How we reveal, understand and work with power dynamics when working with conflict, violence and abuse
建立更好的关系:在预防性处理家庭暴力和虐待时发展批判性反思实践
背景和背景:本文介绍了对批判性反思实践发展的批判性参与性行动研究的反思,由第一作者与在家庭暴力和虐待领域从事预防性工作的从业者一起进行。这是健康科学博士学位的一部分,是为了应对在一个复杂和有害的跨专业实践领域质疑假设、预设和意义观点的需要而进行的。目的:研究的目的是在这一不明确的实践领域发展知识和专业/跨专业实践,分为两个阶段:第一阶段:为跨专业批判性反思创造机会;第二阶段:检查这对个人和集体实践的影响。本文为批判性反思的跨专业实践提供了一个新兴框架,并通过定性研究的真诚和意义,从内部/从业者/研究者的角度对研究的第一阶段进行了批判性反思。对实践的启示:文章最后提出了以下领域对实践发展的潜在重要启示:跨专业实践发展批判性反思实践所需的条件我们如何在处理冲突、暴力和虐待时揭示、理解和处理权力动态
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信