Social Capital Moderating Roles towards Relationship of Motoves, Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Cases in Indonesian Banking Industry

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT
D. Ariani
{"title":"Social Capital Moderating Roles towards Relationship of Motoves, Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Cases in Indonesian Banking Industry","authors":"D. Ariani","doi":"10.21002/SEAM.V4I2.5637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe research employs variables that influence individual behavior, such as personal or dispositional variables based on the personality and attribution theory and situational variables based on social exchange theory. In terms of social exchange theory, positive working experience has impacts on the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), although researchers in the field failed to show the existence of employees' rotation (Bowler and Brass, 2006). Strong friendship gives reciprocal effect and social exchange, and also drives organizational citizenship behavior. OCB is actually influenced by interdependent situation that the work setting becomes strong determinant and this influences the OCB in addition to the existence of personal characteristics such as personality (Comeau and Griffith, 2005).This study integrates three theories that ground the antecedent of employees' organizational citizenship behavior assuming that, in general, individual behavior is driven by personal factors, such as personality and motives, and situational factors, such as relationship with others, trust and the existence of shared values. The combination of the two factors based on the three theories is an accordance with Mitchell and James (2001) who stated that building a better theory needs to integrate theory, design and analysis, so that falsification can be correctly carried out, both theoretically and methodologically.Further, the explanations on dispositional and situational factors are not mutually exclusive (Gerhart, 2005). There are methods in relating one with the other (Cohrs, et al. 2006). The first is the influence of dispositional and situational factors to behavior both directly and simultaneously. Next factor is the spurious correlation between situational factor and behavior due to the dispositional factor. The third is the influence of dispositional factor towards behavior moderated by situational factor. Individual commits OCB when they know and trust each other, as well as sharing the same values. The influence of dispositional factors on behavior is moderated by situational factors. Besides, individual behaves because of certain drives or motives and he has a personality that supports the behavior.Besides, judgments from different parties give different evaluation perspectives and provide valuable information that increases the validity of individual performance rating (Van der Heijden and Nijhof, 2004). Self and other ratings in the OCB give significant influence towards motives of carrying out the behavior in question (Finkelstein and Penner, 2004; Penner et al., 2005). Supervisor-rating was employed to minimize problems related to the bias resulted from using the self-rating by self reporting in judging a variable (Organ and Ryan, 1995).The main objective of the research was to test the influence of social capital moderation towards the model of relations between core-self evaluation and three motives of organizational citizenship behavior application. The research was carried out by employing two raters in evaluating employees' OCBs. The theoretical and empirical results stated that individual performance had two dimensions, role-based performance or task performance and non role-based performance or OCB (Borman and Motowidlo, 1993). OCB is often considered as supporting factor in social and psychological environment in achieving task performance (Organ, 1997; Bergeron, 2005). Many moderating variables such as organizational, situational, and individual help to understand the relations of OCB antecedents with the behavior in question.Literature ReviewOrganizational citizenship behaviorOCB is a unique aspect in individual's activities in a workplace. However, the activities are not formally required in work, independent, and not stated explicitly in the formal work procedures and in the waging system. Because of its independence, control decreases behaviors that do not belong to the roles (Niehoff and Moorman, 1993). …","PeriodicalId":41895,"journal":{"name":"South East Asian Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21002/SEAM.V4I2.5637","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South East Asian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/SEAM.V4I2.5637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

IntroductionThe research employs variables that influence individual behavior, such as personal or dispositional variables based on the personality and attribution theory and situational variables based on social exchange theory. In terms of social exchange theory, positive working experience has impacts on the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), although researchers in the field failed to show the existence of employees' rotation (Bowler and Brass, 2006). Strong friendship gives reciprocal effect and social exchange, and also drives organizational citizenship behavior. OCB is actually influenced by interdependent situation that the work setting becomes strong determinant and this influences the OCB in addition to the existence of personal characteristics such as personality (Comeau and Griffith, 2005).This study integrates three theories that ground the antecedent of employees' organizational citizenship behavior assuming that, in general, individual behavior is driven by personal factors, such as personality and motives, and situational factors, such as relationship with others, trust and the existence of shared values. The combination of the two factors based on the three theories is an accordance with Mitchell and James (2001) who stated that building a better theory needs to integrate theory, design and analysis, so that falsification can be correctly carried out, both theoretically and methodologically.Further, the explanations on dispositional and situational factors are not mutually exclusive (Gerhart, 2005). There are methods in relating one with the other (Cohrs, et al. 2006). The first is the influence of dispositional and situational factors to behavior both directly and simultaneously. Next factor is the spurious correlation between situational factor and behavior due to the dispositional factor. The third is the influence of dispositional factor towards behavior moderated by situational factor. Individual commits OCB when they know and trust each other, as well as sharing the same values. The influence of dispositional factors on behavior is moderated by situational factors. Besides, individual behaves because of certain drives or motives and he has a personality that supports the behavior.Besides, judgments from different parties give different evaluation perspectives and provide valuable information that increases the validity of individual performance rating (Van der Heijden and Nijhof, 2004). Self and other ratings in the OCB give significant influence towards motives of carrying out the behavior in question (Finkelstein and Penner, 2004; Penner et al., 2005). Supervisor-rating was employed to minimize problems related to the bias resulted from using the self-rating by self reporting in judging a variable (Organ and Ryan, 1995).The main objective of the research was to test the influence of social capital moderation towards the model of relations between core-self evaluation and three motives of organizational citizenship behavior application. The research was carried out by employing two raters in evaluating employees' OCBs. The theoretical and empirical results stated that individual performance had two dimensions, role-based performance or task performance and non role-based performance or OCB (Borman and Motowidlo, 1993). OCB is often considered as supporting factor in social and psychological environment in achieving task performance (Organ, 1997; Bergeron, 2005). Many moderating variables such as organizational, situational, and individual help to understand the relations of OCB antecedents with the behavior in question.Literature ReviewOrganizational citizenship behaviorOCB is a unique aspect in individual's activities in a workplace. However, the activities are not formally required in work, independent, and not stated explicitly in the formal work procedures and in the waging system. Because of its independence, control decreases behaviors that do not belong to the roles (Niehoff and Moorman, 1993). …
社会资本对动机、人格和组织公民行为关系的调节作用:以印尼银行业为例
本研究采用影响个体行为的变量,如基于人格与归因理论的个人或性格变量和基于社会交换理论的情境变量。在社会交换理论中,积极的工作经验对组织公民行为(OCB)有影响,尽管该领域的研究者未能证明员工轮换的存在(Bowler and Brass, 2006)。牢固的友谊产生了互惠效应和社会交换,也推动了组织公民行为。组织公民行为实际上受到相互依存情况的影响,工作环境成为强大的决定因素,除了人格等个人特征的存在之外,这也影响了组织公民行为(Comeau and Griffith, 2005)。本研究整合了三种理论,这些理论为员工组织公民行为的前因奠定了基础,假设个人行为通常受到个人因素(如个性和动机)和情境因素(如与他人的关系、信任和共同价值观的存在)的驱动。在三种理论的基础上将两种因素结合起来,这与Mitchell和James(2001)的观点是一致的,他们认为建立一个更好的理论需要将理论、设计和分析结合起来,这样才能在理论和方法上正确地进行证伪。此外,性格因素和情境因素的解释并不相互排斥(Gerhart, 2005)。有一些方法可以将一个与另一个联系起来(Cohrs, et al. 2006)。首先是性格和情境因素对行为的直接和同时的影响。下一个因素是由于性格因素导致的情景因素和行为之间的虚假相关性。三是性格因素对行为的影响受情境因素的调节。当个体之间相互了解和信任,并且具有相同的价值观时,才会提交OCB。性格因素对行为的影响受情境因素的调节。此外,个人的行为是由于某种驱动或动机,他有一种支持这种行为的人格。此外,来自不同各方的判断给出了不同的评价视角,并提供了有价值的信息,增加了个人绩效评级的有效性(Van der Heijden and Nijhof, 2004)。组织公民行为委员会中的自我和其他评价对行为动机有显著影响(Finkelstein and Penner, 2004;Penner et al., 2005)。采用Supervisor-rating是为了最大限度地减少在判断变量时使用自我报告的自评所产生的偏差问题(Organ and Ryan, 1995)。本研究的主要目的是检验社会资本调节对核心自我评价与组织公民行为应用三种动机之间关系模型的影响。本研究采用两种评分法对员工的组织行为进行评估。理论和实证结果表明,个人绩效有两个维度,即基于角色的绩效或任务绩效和非基于角色的绩效或组织公民行为(Borman and Motowidlo, 1993)。组织公民行为通常被认为是社会和心理环境中实现任务绩效的支持因素(Organ, 1997;Bergeron, 2005)。组织、情境和个体等调节变量有助于理解组织公民行为前因与行为之间的关系。组织公民行为组织公民行为是个人在工作场所活动的一个独特方面。然而,这些活动在工作中并不是正式要求的,是独立的,也没有在正式的工作程序和执行系统中明确规定。控制由于其独立性,减少了不属于角色的行为(Niehoff and Moorman, 1993)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信