A Giant Step Backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU's Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights

J. Odermatt
{"title":"A Giant Step Backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU's Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights","authors":"J. Odermatt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2654633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 18 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered Opinion 2/13 on whether the Draft Agreement on the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights is compatible with EU law. The Court found that the Agreement did not sufficiently take into account the specific nature of the European Union, and that it in many ways violated the ‘autonomy’ of the EU legal order. This Working Paper examines the Court’s findings in Opinion 2/13 and the reasons why it rejected the draft Accession Agreement. It focuses on the most troubling finding: that that the Strasbourg Court’s jurisdiction over the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy in the fails to have regard to the specific features of EU law. The Working Paper concludes by looking at the next steps that could be taken in order for the EU to accede to the Convention.","PeriodicalId":82132,"journal":{"name":"New York University journal of international law & politics. New York University. International Law Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"783-797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New York University journal of international law & politics. New York University. International Law Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2654633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

On 18 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered Opinion 2/13 on whether the Draft Agreement on the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights is compatible with EU law. The Court found that the Agreement did not sufficiently take into account the specific nature of the European Union, and that it in many ways violated the ‘autonomy’ of the EU legal order. This Working Paper examines the Court’s findings in Opinion 2/13 and the reasons why it rejected the draft Accession Agreement. It focuses on the most troubling finding: that that the Strasbourg Court’s jurisdiction over the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy in the fails to have regard to the specific features of EU law. The Working Paper concludes by looking at the next steps that could be taken in order for the EU to accede to the Convention.
倒退一大步?关于欧盟加入《欧洲人权公约》的第2/13号意见
2014年12月18日,欧盟法院就欧盟加入《欧洲人权公约》协议草案是否符合欧盟法律发表了第2/13号意见。法院认为,该协议没有充分考虑到欧盟的具体性质,并且在许多方面违反了欧盟法律秩序的“自主性”。本工作文件审查了法院在第2/13号意见中的结论以及法院拒绝加入协定草案的原因。它集中于最令人不安的发现:斯特拉斯堡法院对欧盟共同外交和安全政策的管辖权未能考虑到欧盟法律的具体特征。工作文件最后展望了为使欧盟加入《公约》可以采取的下一步措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信