The Formation of Rational and Irrational Behaviors in Risky Investment Decision Making: Laboratory Experiment of Coping Theory Implication in Investors’ Adaptation Model

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
W. Wendy, Marwan Asri, Jogiyanto Hartono
{"title":"The Formation of Rational and Irrational Behaviors in Risky Investment Decision Making: Laboratory Experiment of Coping Theory Implication in Investors’ Adaptation Model","authors":"W. Wendy, Marwan Asri, Jogiyanto Hartono","doi":"10.21002/ICMR.V4I2.3615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the stock investor's rational and irrational behavior formation through Investor's Adaptation model. Hypotheses testings were conducted by manipulating four market conditions using between-subject experimental design. The results supported the hypotheses proposed in this study. When given treatment one (opportunity-high control), investors tended to adapt the profit maximizing strategy (rational). Meanwhile, when given treatment two (opportunity-low control), three (threat-high control) and four (threat-low control), they tended to adapt the profit satisfying strategy (rational-emotional), bad news handling strategy (emotional-rational), and self-preserving strategy (irrational) respectively. The application of rational strategies are intended to obtain personal benefits and profit, while adapting irrational strategy is intended to recover emotional stability and reduce some other tensions. Another finding showed that for the investors, the relatively irrational decision formation was \"harder\" than that of rational.","PeriodicalId":40640,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/ICMR.V4I2.3615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study analyzes the stock investor's rational and irrational behavior formation through Investor's Adaptation model. Hypotheses testings were conducted by manipulating four market conditions using between-subject experimental design. The results supported the hypotheses proposed in this study. When given treatment one (opportunity-high control), investors tended to adapt the profit maximizing strategy (rational). Meanwhile, when given treatment two (opportunity-low control), three (threat-high control) and four (threat-low control), they tended to adapt the profit satisfying strategy (rational-emotional), bad news handling strategy (emotional-rational), and self-preserving strategy (irrational) respectively. The application of rational strategies are intended to obtain personal benefits and profit, while adapting irrational strategy is intended to recover emotional stability and reduce some other tensions. Another finding showed that for the investors, the relatively irrational decision formation was "harder" than that of rational.
风险投资决策中理性与非理性行为的形成:应对理论对投资者适应模型影响的实验室实验
本文通过投资者适应模型分析了股票投资者理性和非理性行为的形成。采用受试者间实验设计,通过操纵四种市场条件进行假设检验。结果支持了本研究提出的假设。当给予处理一(机会高控制)时,投资者倾向于采用利润最大化策略(理性)。同时,在处理二(低机会控制)、处理三(高威胁控制)和处理四(低威胁控制)时,他们分别倾向于采用满足利润的策略(理性-情绪)、处理坏消息的策略(情绪-理性)和自我保护的策略(非理性)。运用理性策略是为了获取个人利益和利润,而采用非理性策略是为了恢复情绪稳定,减少其他一些紧张。另一项发现表明,对于投资者来说,相对非理性的决策形成比理性的决策形成“更难”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书