{"title":"Reporting Intellectual Capital in Annual Reports: Evidence from Indonesia","authors":"Parulian Sihotang, Yulia Sanjaya","doi":"10.21002/ICMR.V1I2.3653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study which replicates the content analysis methodology of Guthrie et all (1999, 2004) towards Intellectual Capital (IC) disclosures in the annual report has set several objectives. Primarily, the empirical investigation assesses the extent to which Indonesian listed companies are publicly reporting their IC both the amount and type of information being reported. Secondly, the investigation also examines the extent to which the various categories of IC are represented in the annual reports of the sample companies. Finally, the study explores the extent to which the level of IC disclosures could be related to companies' characteristics such as industry category, age, ownership structure and market capitalization. The sample was Indonesia's 23 largest companies listed in the Jakarta Stock Exchange. In light of research limitations, the preliminary and tentative indings of this study indicate that irst of all, similar to indings worldwide, Indonesian companies have substantial intellectual capital and they do aware and disclose their intellectual capital in the annual reports. Secondly, IC that tends to be most often reported is relational capital, followed by human capital and organizational capital. Thirdly, even though the trend in IC disclosure as a whole is generally increasing, there is no conclusive and predictable pattern found. Fourthly, the IC identiied and reported is inconsistent as no framework available in helping the companies discloses intellectual capital. Fifthly, most of the intellectual capital components identiied are in qualitative format. Sixthly, even though the study did not ind a conclusive evidence regarding the relationship between the level of IC disclosure and company characteristics such as industry, age, ownership structure, and market capitalization, however some indings are noteworthy. Finally, a comprehensive framework is yet to be developed, especially for collecting and reporting IC formation for consistency and comparability purposes. \");} \n// --> activate javascript","PeriodicalId":40640,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/ICMR.V1I2.3653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
Abstract
This exploratory study which replicates the content analysis methodology of Guthrie et all (1999, 2004) towards Intellectual Capital (IC) disclosures in the annual report has set several objectives. Primarily, the empirical investigation assesses the extent to which Indonesian listed companies are publicly reporting their IC both the amount and type of information being reported. Secondly, the investigation also examines the extent to which the various categories of IC are represented in the annual reports of the sample companies. Finally, the study explores the extent to which the level of IC disclosures could be related to companies' characteristics such as industry category, age, ownership structure and market capitalization. The sample was Indonesia's 23 largest companies listed in the Jakarta Stock Exchange. In light of research limitations, the preliminary and tentative indings of this study indicate that irst of all, similar to indings worldwide, Indonesian companies have substantial intellectual capital and they do aware and disclose their intellectual capital in the annual reports. Secondly, IC that tends to be most often reported is relational capital, followed by human capital and organizational capital. Thirdly, even though the trend in IC disclosure as a whole is generally increasing, there is no conclusive and predictable pattern found. Fourthly, the IC identiied and reported is inconsistent as no framework available in helping the companies discloses intellectual capital. Fifthly, most of the intellectual capital components identiied are in qualitative format. Sixthly, even though the study did not ind a conclusive evidence regarding the relationship between the level of IC disclosure and company characteristics such as industry, age, ownership structure, and market capitalization, however some indings are noteworthy. Finally, a comprehensive framework is yet to be developed, especially for collecting and reporting IC formation for consistency and comparability purposes. ");}
// --> activate javascript
这项探索性研究复制了Guthrie et all(1999,2004)对年度报告中智力资本(IC)披露的内容分析方法,并设定了几个目标。首先,实证调查评估了印尼上市公司公开报告其IC的程度,包括所报告信息的数量和类型。其次,调查还考察了在样本公司的年度报告中不同类别的集成电路的代表程度。最后,该研究探讨了IC披露水平与公司特征(如行业类别、年龄、所有权结构和市值)的关系程度。样本是印尼在雅加达证券交易所上市的23家最大的公司。鉴于研究的局限性,本研究的初步和初步结论表明,首先,与世界范围内的结论相似,印度尼西亚公司拥有大量的智力资本,他们确实意识到并在年度报告中披露了他们的智力资本。其次,最常被报道的IC是关系资本,其次是人力资本和组织资本。第三,尽管整体上IC披露的趋势普遍增加,但没有发现结论性和可预测的模式。第四,识别和报告的IC不一致,因为没有可用的框架来帮助公司披露智力资本。第五,大多数智力资本成分都是定性的。第六,尽管该研究没有发现关于IC披露水平与公司特征(如行业、年龄、所有权结构和市值)之间关系的结论性证据,但一些结论值得注意。最后,还需要制定一个全面的框架,特别是为了一致性和可比性的目的而收集和报告IC形成情况。} //——>激活javascript