Reporting Intellectual Capital in Annual Reports: Evidence from Indonesia

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
Parulian Sihotang, Yulia Sanjaya
{"title":"Reporting Intellectual Capital in Annual Reports: Evidence from Indonesia","authors":"Parulian Sihotang, Yulia Sanjaya","doi":"10.21002/ICMR.V1I2.3653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This  exploratory  study  which  replicates  the  content  analysis  methodology  of  Guthrie et  all  (1999,  2004)  towards  Intellectual  Capital  (IC)  disclosures  in  the  annual  report  has set  several  objectives.  Primarily,  the  empirical  investigation  assesses  the  extent  to  which Indonesian  listed  companies  are  publicly  reporting  their  IC  both  the  amount  and  type  of information  being  reported.  Secondly,  the  investigation  also  examines  the  extent  to  which the various categories of IC are represented in the annual reports of the sample companies. Finally, the study explores the extent to which the level of IC disclosures could be related to companies' characteristics such as industry category, age, ownership structure and market capitalization.  The sample was Indonesia's 23 largest companies listed in the Jakarta Stock Exchange.  In  light  of  research  limitations,  the  preliminary  and  tentative  indings  of  this study  indicate  that  irst  of  all,  similar  to  indings  worldwide,  Indonesian  companies  have substantial intellectual capital and they do aware and disclose their intellectual capital in the annual reports. Secondly, IC that tends to be most often reported is relational capital, followed by human capital and organizational capital. Thirdly, even though the trend in IC disclosure as a whole is generally increasing, there is no conclusive and predictable pattern found.  Fourthly,  the  IC  identiied  and  reported  is  inconsistent  as  no  framework  available in  helping  the  companies  discloses  intellectual  capital.  Fifthly,  most  of  the  intellectual capital  components  identiied  are  in  qualitative  format.  Sixthly,  even  though  the  study  did not ind a conclusive evidence regarding the relationship between the level of  IC  disclosure and  company  characteristics  such  as  industry,  age,  ownership  structure,  and  market capitalization, however some indings are noteworthy. Finally, a comprehensive framework is yet to be developed, especially for collecting and reporting IC formation for consistency and comparability purposes. \");} \n// --> activate javascript","PeriodicalId":40640,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Capital Market Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/ICMR.V1I2.3653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

This  exploratory  study  which  replicates  the  content  analysis  methodology  of  Guthrie et  all  (1999,  2004)  towards  Intellectual  Capital  (IC)  disclosures  in  the  annual  report  has set  several  objectives.  Primarily,  the  empirical  investigation  assesses  the  extent  to  which Indonesian  listed  companies  are  publicly  reporting  their  IC  both  the  amount  and  type  of information  being  reported.  Secondly,  the  investigation  also  examines  the  extent  to  which the various categories of IC are represented in the annual reports of the sample companies. Finally, the study explores the extent to which the level of IC disclosures could be related to companies' characteristics such as industry category, age, ownership structure and market capitalization.  The sample was Indonesia's 23 largest companies listed in the Jakarta Stock Exchange.  In  light  of  research  limitations,  the  preliminary  and  tentative  indings  of  this study  indicate  that  irst  of  all,  similar  to  indings  worldwide,  Indonesian  companies  have substantial intellectual capital and they do aware and disclose their intellectual capital in the annual reports. Secondly, IC that tends to be most often reported is relational capital, followed by human capital and organizational capital. Thirdly, even though the trend in IC disclosure as a whole is generally increasing, there is no conclusive and predictable pattern found.  Fourthly,  the  IC  identiied  and  reported  is  inconsistent  as  no  framework  available in  helping  the  companies  discloses  intellectual  capital.  Fifthly,  most  of  the  intellectual capital  components  identiied  are  in  qualitative  format.  Sixthly,  even  though  the  study  did not ind a conclusive evidence regarding the relationship between the level of  IC  disclosure and  company  characteristics  such  as  industry,  age,  ownership  structure,  and  market capitalization, however some indings are noteworthy. Finally, a comprehensive framework is yet to be developed, especially for collecting and reporting IC formation for consistency and comparability purposes. ");} // --> activate javascript
在年度报告中报告智力资本:来自印度尼西亚的证据
这项探索性研究复制了Guthrie et all(1999,2004)对年度报告中智力资本(IC)披露的内容分析方法,并设定了几个目标。首先,实证调查评估了印尼上市公司公开报告其IC的程度,包括所报告信息的数量和类型。其次,调查还考察了在样本公司的年度报告中不同类别的集成电路的代表程度。最后,该研究探讨了IC披露水平与公司特征(如行业类别、年龄、所有权结构和市值)的关系程度。样本是印尼在雅加达证券交易所上市的23家最大的公司。鉴于研究的局限性,本研究的初步和初步结论表明,首先,与世界范围内的结论相似,印度尼西亚公司拥有大量的智力资本,他们确实意识到并在年度报告中披露了他们的智力资本。其次,最常被报道的IC是关系资本,其次是人力资本和组织资本。第三,尽管整体上IC披露的趋势普遍增加,但没有发现结论性和可预测的模式。第四,识别和报告的IC不一致,因为没有可用的框架来帮助公司披露智力资本。第五,大多数智力资本成分都是定性的。第六,尽管该研究没有发现关于IC披露水平与公司特征(如行业、年龄、所有权结构和市值)之间关系的结论性证据,但一些结论值得注意。最后,还需要制定一个全面的框架,特别是为了一致性和可比性的目的而收集和报告IC形成情况。} //——>激活javascript
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书