{"title":"No African-American Lawyers Allowed: The Inefficient Racism of the ABA's Accreditation of Law Schools.","authors":"G. Shepherd","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.263211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic analysis demonstrates that, continuing from its intentionally racist beginnings in the 1920s, the American Bar Association's system for accrediting law schools excludes most African-Americans from the legal profession, while allowing whites to enter. The discriminatory impact of ABA accreditation takes two forms. First, the ABA accreditation standards inflict academic racism. The standards impose academic requirements that African-Americans tend to lack, eliminating most schools that would serve average African-Americans. For example, the ABA generally denies accreditation to any school for which the average LSAT score is below 143. The average LSAT score for African-Americans is 142, compared to 152 for whites. The ABA's requirements of high undergraduate grades and high bar-pass rates are similarly discriminatory. Second, ABA accreditation imposes financial racism. The accreditation requirements cause law schools' costs and tuition levels to more than double. Because African-Americans have far lower average incomes than whites, the requirements make law school affordable only for whites, not for most African-Americans. Affirmative action and the availability of student loans counteract only a small part of the accreditation system's discriminatory impacts. Elimination of both accreditation and the bar exam would integrate the profession and provide many other benefits, while producing few harms.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.263211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Economic analysis demonstrates that, continuing from its intentionally racist beginnings in the 1920s, the American Bar Association's system for accrediting law schools excludes most African-Americans from the legal profession, while allowing whites to enter. The discriminatory impact of ABA accreditation takes two forms. First, the ABA accreditation standards inflict academic racism. The standards impose academic requirements that African-Americans tend to lack, eliminating most schools that would serve average African-Americans. For example, the ABA generally denies accreditation to any school for which the average LSAT score is below 143. The average LSAT score for African-Americans is 142, compared to 152 for whites. The ABA's requirements of high undergraduate grades and high bar-pass rates are similarly discriminatory. Second, ABA accreditation imposes financial racism. The accreditation requirements cause law schools' costs and tuition levels to more than double. Because African-Americans have far lower average incomes than whites, the requirements make law school affordable only for whites, not for most African-Americans. Affirmative action and the availability of student loans counteract only a small part of the accreditation system's discriminatory impacts. Elimination of both accreditation and the bar exam would integrate the profession and provide many other benefits, while producing few harms.
经济分析表明,从20世纪20年代开始,美国律师协会(American Bar Association)的法学院认证体系就开始有意地实行种族主义,它将大多数非洲裔美国人排除在法律职业之外,而允许白人进入。美国律师协会认证的歧视性影响有两种形式。首先,美国律师协会的认证标准造成了学术种族歧视。这些标准强加了非裔美国人往往缺乏的学术要求,导致大多数为普通非裔美国人服务的学校被淘汰。例如,美国律师协会通常拒绝认可任何LSAT平均分数低于143分的学校。非裔美国人的LSAT平均分是142分,而白人是152分。美国律师协会对本科高等级和高律师通过率的要求同样具有歧视性。第二,美国律师协会的认证强加了金融种族主义。认证要求导致法学院的成本和学费水平增加了一倍以上。由于非洲裔美国人的平均收入远低于白人,这些要求使得只有白人负担得起法学院,而不是大多数非洲裔美国人。平权行动和学生贷款的可用性只能抵消认证制度歧视影响的一小部分。取消资格认证和律师资格考试将整合这个行业,并带来许多其他好处,同时几乎不会造成伤害。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.