Jansenism between Theology and Politics. On Herder's interpretation of Jansenism

E. Kiss
{"title":"Jansenism between Theology and Politics. On Herder's interpretation of Jansenism","authors":"E. Kiss","doi":"10.17107/kh.2023.26.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jansenism was a special kind of political theology and a real chapter in the history of European civilization. Even in our days, it is not considered completely revealed. The term \"political theology\" is a special category since it is the final outcome of prolonged research and interpretation procedures. These outcomes are hardly useful as footnotes only behind the term itself. They are rather to be mentioned in further explanations. Nevertheless, any political theology is primarily theology. Its political dimensions are determined partly through the perceived and verified position in its real-time society, and partly by primary and complete interpretation through biblical exegesis and dogmata which were understood as political acts contemporarily (but perhaps also later). Luther's criticism of selling indulgences may have been a simple and striking example. The practice of selling indulgences was undoubtedly a theological problem, but there was inevitable (as it really happened) its political nature too. In the case of creating sometimes a typology of \"political\" theologies it would be certainly interesting to study its relevant types. Nevertheless, it is clear that there are generally existing types of politically converted theology which return in similar forms from time to time with their own historical depth. Therefore it is not necessary to generate it repeatedly as a new discovery while targeting a way of thinking of any specific era. Political theology, as it must always be emphasized, is primarily theology. However, its conversion to a political one may be caused (as it was mentioned above) by a huge number of factors, let alone real historical incidences by any fortune. Thus, it is obvious that the theological factor is predominant in any interpretation. This way, reconstruction of the same factor is a key to opening the gate to political interpretation. Anyway, this dominancy even by recognising its nature cannot disguise the political background. Regarding these, transparency and intellectual courage are necessary to any interpretation since political struggle fought out in the medium of theology may discover substantial secrets as well.","PeriodicalId":53287,"journal":{"name":"Kaleidoscope History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kaleidoscope History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17107/kh.2023.26.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jansenism was a special kind of political theology and a real chapter in the history of European civilization. Even in our days, it is not considered completely revealed. The term "political theology" is a special category since it is the final outcome of prolonged research and interpretation procedures. These outcomes are hardly useful as footnotes only behind the term itself. They are rather to be mentioned in further explanations. Nevertheless, any political theology is primarily theology. Its political dimensions are determined partly through the perceived and verified position in its real-time society, and partly by primary and complete interpretation through biblical exegesis and dogmata which were understood as political acts contemporarily (but perhaps also later). Luther's criticism of selling indulgences may have been a simple and striking example. The practice of selling indulgences was undoubtedly a theological problem, but there was inevitable (as it really happened) its political nature too. In the case of creating sometimes a typology of "political" theologies it would be certainly interesting to study its relevant types. Nevertheless, it is clear that there are generally existing types of politically converted theology which return in similar forms from time to time with their own historical depth. Therefore it is not necessary to generate it repeatedly as a new discovery while targeting a way of thinking of any specific era. Political theology, as it must always be emphasized, is primarily theology. However, its conversion to a political one may be caused (as it was mentioned above) by a huge number of factors, let alone real historical incidences by any fortune. Thus, it is obvious that the theological factor is predominant in any interpretation. This way, reconstruction of the same factor is a key to opening the gate to political interpretation. Anyway, this dominancy even by recognising its nature cannot disguise the political background. Regarding these, transparency and intellectual courage are necessary to any interpretation since political struggle fought out in the medium of theology may discover substantial secrets as well.
神学与政治之间的詹森主义。论赫尔德对詹森主义的解释
詹森主义是一种特殊的政治神学,是欧洲文明史上真正的篇章。即使在我们的时代,也没有完全显露出来。“政治神学”一词是一个特殊的范畴,因为它是长期研究和解释程序的最终结果。这些结果仅仅作为术语本身的脚注,几乎没有用。它们将在进一步的解释中被提及。然而,任何政治神学基本上都是神学。它的政治维度部分是由其在现实社会中被感知和证实的地位决定的,部分是由通过圣经注释和教义的主要和完整的解释决定的,这些解释被理解为当代(但也可能是后来)的政治行为。路德对出售赎罪券的批评可能是一个简单而引人注目的例子。出售赎罪券的做法无疑是一个神学问题,但也有不可避免的政治本质(正如它确实发生的那样)。在创造“政治”神学的类型学的情况下,研究它的相关类型肯定会很有趣。然而,很明显,一般存在的类型的政治转换神学,返回类似的形式,不时与自己的历史深度。因此,没有必要针对某一特定时代的思维方式,将其作为一种新发现反复产生。必须一再强调的是,政治神学首先是神学。然而,它向政治的转变可能是由许多因素造成的(正如上面提到的),更不用说真正的历史事件了。因此,很明显,神学因素在任何解释中都占主导地位。这样,同一因素的重构是打开政治解释大门的一把钥匙。无论如何,即使承认其本质,这种主导地位也无法掩盖其政治背景。关于这些,透明和智慧的勇气对于任何解释都是必要的,因为在神学媒介中进行的政治斗争也可能发现实质性的秘密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信