{"title":"Association of Pars Defect Type with Clinical Outcome after Smiley Face Rod Methods for Terminal-Stage Spondylolysis.","authors":"Shun Okuwaki, Masaki Tatsumura, Hisanori Gamada, Reo Asai, Katsuya Nagashima, Yosuke Takeuchi, Toru Funayama, Masashi Yamazaki","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The smiley face rod method is an effective treatment for symptomatic terminal-stage spondylolysis. However, the risk factors for treatment failure are unknown. We investigated the association of pars defect type with the treatment outcomes of this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined data from 34 patients (18.0±6.7 years) with terminal-stage spondylolysis who underwent surgery using the smiley face rod method. The mean follow-up period was 44.9±21.4 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups: pars defect without bone atrophy or sclerosis (group A; 18 patients), and with bone atrophy and sclerosis (group B; 16 patients). We evaluated and compared the visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain, bone union rate, and time to return to preinjury athletics level between the groups. Fisher exact and paired <i>t</i> tests were used to compare the variables between groups. The VAS score between the groups was compared using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within groups, the VAS score was significantly different over time (<i>p</i><0.001). The VAS scores between groups were not significantly different. Patients in group A had a significantly higher bone union rate per pars at 6 months (group A, 65.7%; and group B, 37.5%, <i>p</i>=0.028) and 24 months after surgery (group A, 97.1%; and group B, 75.0%, <i>p</i>=0.011). All patients returned to their respective sports, and no significant differences were observed in the time to return to preinjury athletics level between the groups (<i>p</i>=0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The type of pars defect are associated with bone union after the smiley face rod method, but have little effect on postoperative symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The smiley face rod method is an effective treatment for symptomatic terminal-stage spondylolysis. However, the risk factors for treatment failure are unknown. We investigated the association of pars defect type with the treatment outcomes of this method.
Methods: We retrospectively examined data from 34 patients (18.0±6.7 years) with terminal-stage spondylolysis who underwent surgery using the smiley face rod method. The mean follow-up period was 44.9±21.4 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups: pars defect without bone atrophy or sclerosis (group A; 18 patients), and with bone atrophy and sclerosis (group B; 16 patients). We evaluated and compared the visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain, bone union rate, and time to return to preinjury athletics level between the groups. Fisher exact and paired t tests were used to compare the variables between groups. The VAS score between the groups was compared using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance.
Results: Within groups, the VAS score was significantly different over time (p<0.001). The VAS scores between groups were not significantly different. Patients in group A had a significantly higher bone union rate per pars at 6 months (group A, 65.7%; and group B, 37.5%, p=0.028) and 24 months after surgery (group A, 97.1%; and group B, 75.0%, p=0.011). All patients returned to their respective sports, and no significant differences were observed in the time to return to preinjury athletics level between the groups (p=0.055).
Conclusions: The type of pars defect are associated with bone union after the smiley face rod method, but have little effect on postoperative symptoms.
简介笑脸棒法是治疗无症状终末期脊柱溶解症的有效方法。然而,治疗失败的风险因素尚不清楚。我们研究了椎旁缺损类型与该方法治疗效果的关系:我们回顾性研究了34例(18.0±6.7岁)终末期脊柱溶解症患者的数据,这些患者均接受了笑脸棒法手术。平均随访时间为(44.9±21.4)个月。患者被分为两组:无骨质萎缩或硬化的椎旁缺损组(A 组,18 名患者)和有骨质萎缩和硬化的椎旁缺损组(B 组,16 名患者)。我们对两组患者的背痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、骨结合率和恢复到受伤前运动水平的时间进行了评估和比较。我们使用费舍尔精确检验和配对 t 检验来比较组间变量。采用双因素重复测量方差分析比较组间的 VAS 评分:在各组内,VAS评分随时间(pp=0.028)和术后24个月有显著差异(A组,97.1%;B组,75.0%,p=0.011)。所有患者都恢复了各自的运动,在恢复到受伤前运动水平的时间上,各组之间没有观察到明显差异(P=0.055):结论:髋臼旁缺损的类型与笑脸棒法术后骨结合有关,但对术后症状影响不大。