{"title":"Motivation of foreigners to learn the Lithuanian language","authors":"Jakub Kubś, Aleksandra Michałowska-Kubś","doi":"10.22601/PET.2020.05.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article discusses the motivation of adults coming to Lithu ania to learn Lithuanian as a foreign language 1 . The motivational back ground for learning “small” languages will be discussed. Lithuanian, spo ken by approximately 3.5 million people worldwide, is an example of a less popular choice for foreign language learners. However, reindependence in 1991 and joining the European Union in 2004 created new opportunities for teaching Lithuanian as a foreign language. In this paper we wanted to examine the motivational factors driving foreign adults to come to Lithu ania to learn its language. The theoretical framework was based on the motivation theories of Gardner and Lambert (1972) and Deci and Ryan (1985). The main tool used for the purpose of research was the Foreign Language Learning Motivation Questionnaire (Gonzales, Lopez 2016). We conducted quantitative research on a representative sample of 114 respon dents who participated in different language courses in Lithuania. The results show that learning Lithuanian is strongly connected with internal and integrative motivation, rather than external and instrumental, while the autotelic value of Lithuanian language was also highly rated by the stu dents. This confirms that learning “small” languages needs special moti vation and instrumental factor plays a lesser role. The article ends with a discussion of the results within a wider context.","PeriodicalId":52210,"journal":{"name":"Philologia Estonica Tallinnensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologia Estonica Tallinnensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22601/PET.2020.05.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
. The article discusses the motivation of adults coming to Lithu ania to learn Lithuanian as a foreign language 1 . The motivational back ground for learning “small” languages will be discussed. Lithuanian, spo ken by approximately 3.5 million people worldwide, is an example of a less popular choice for foreign language learners. However, reindependence in 1991 and joining the European Union in 2004 created new opportunities for teaching Lithuanian as a foreign language. In this paper we wanted to examine the motivational factors driving foreign adults to come to Lithu ania to learn its language. The theoretical framework was based on the motivation theories of Gardner and Lambert (1972) and Deci and Ryan (1985). The main tool used for the purpose of research was the Foreign Language Learning Motivation Questionnaire (Gonzales, Lopez 2016). We conducted quantitative research on a representative sample of 114 respon dents who participated in different language courses in Lithuania. The results show that learning Lithuanian is strongly connected with internal and integrative motivation, rather than external and instrumental, while the autotelic value of Lithuanian language was also highly rated by the stu dents. This confirms that learning “small” languages needs special moti vation and instrumental factor plays a lesser role. The article ends with a discussion of the results within a wider context.
. 这篇文章讨论了成年人来立陶宛学习立陶宛语作为外语的动机。学习“小”语言的动机背景将被讨论。全世界大约有350万人说立陶宛语,这是一个不太受外语学习者欢迎的选择。然而,1991年的重新独立和2004年加入欧盟为立陶宛语作为外语教学创造了新的机会。在这篇论文中,我们想要研究驱使外国成年人来立陶宛学习其语言的动机因素。理论框架以Gardner and Lambert(1972)和Deci and Ryan(1985)的动机理论为基础。用于研究目的的主要工具是外语学习动机问卷(Gonzales, Lopez 2016)。我们对在立陶宛参加不同语言课程的114名受访者的代表性样本进行了定量研究。结果表明,立陶宛语学习与内在的、综合的动机密切相关,而与外在的、工具性的动机无关,同时立陶宛语的自我目的价值也得到了学生的高度评价。这证实了学习“小”语言需要特殊的动机,工具因素的作用较小。文章最后在更广泛的上下文中讨论了结果。