Az elveszett Paradicsom. Kerekasztal beszélgetés egy Bosch kép előtt

F. Csorba
{"title":"Az elveszett Paradicsom. Kerekasztal beszélgetés egy Bosch kép előtt","authors":"F. Csorba","doi":"10.17107/kh.2022.24.389-399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participants of this imaginary conference were invited to share their thoughts on Hieronymus Bosch's painting The Haywain from the perspective of their own discipline. The opening presentation shows the middle part of the Triptichon as a social system that while dissipating the gifts of Paradise is running toward the inferno. The lecturer of \"The Beauty and the Beast\" takes an anatomical approach to Bosch's absurd creatures. These strange monsters indicate that, once natural correlations are eliminated, there are emerging self-sustaining networks in the very short term, but they will be replaced by self-destructive networks in the long run. The approach of landscape ecology reveals the contradiction between the beauty of the cultivated landscape and the selfishness of its cultivators. The \"Limits to Growth\" is an economic-ecological approach, interpreting hay as a symbol of finite resources. It contrasts Malthus' pessimistic forecast with Georgescu-Roegen's economic physics. The \"Selfish genes and the helping whole\" relates the looting in the foreground of Bosch's imaging to Dawkinsian atomized genetics and the harmonious order of the background to Lovelock's Gaia hypothesis. Each of these analyses interprets Bosch’s painting as a warning to rethink our views about the world, our scientific vision and our way of life too.","PeriodicalId":53287,"journal":{"name":"Kaleidoscope History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kaleidoscope History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17107/kh.2022.24.389-399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participants of this imaginary conference were invited to share their thoughts on Hieronymus Bosch's painting The Haywain from the perspective of their own discipline. The opening presentation shows the middle part of the Triptichon as a social system that while dissipating the gifts of Paradise is running toward the inferno. The lecturer of "The Beauty and the Beast" takes an anatomical approach to Bosch's absurd creatures. These strange monsters indicate that, once natural correlations are eliminated, there are emerging self-sustaining networks in the very short term, but they will be replaced by self-destructive networks in the long run. The approach of landscape ecology reveals the contradiction between the beauty of the cultivated landscape and the selfishness of its cultivators. The "Limits to Growth" is an economic-ecological approach, interpreting hay as a symbol of finite resources. It contrasts Malthus' pessimistic forecast with Georgescu-Roegen's economic physics. The "Selfish genes and the helping whole" relates the looting in the foreground of Bosch's imaging to Dawkinsian atomized genetics and the harmonious order of the background to Lovelock's Gaia hypothesis. Each of these analyses interprets Bosch’s painting as a warning to rethink our views about the world, our scientific vision and our way of life too.
失落的天堂。博世图片前的圆桌讨论
这个假想的会议邀请与会者从他们自己学科的角度分享他们对希罗尼穆斯·博斯的画作《海韦恩》的看法。开篇展示了特里普提雄的中间部分,作为一个社会系统,它在消耗天堂的礼物的同时,也在奔向地狱。《美女与野兽》的讲师用解剖学的方法来描述博斯笔下荒谬的生物。这些奇怪的怪物表明,一旦自然关联被消除,短期内就会出现自我维持的网络,但从长远来看,它们将被自我毁灭的网络所取代。景观生态学的研究方法揭示了栽培景观的美与栽培者的自私之间的矛盾。“增长的极限”是一种经济生态学方法,将干草解释为有限资源的象征。它将马尔萨斯的悲观预测与乔治斯库-罗根的经济物理学进行了对比。“自私的基因和帮助的整体”将博世图像前景中的掠夺与道金斯的原子化遗传学联系起来,并将洛夫洛克的盖亚假说背景中的和谐秩序联系起来。这些分析都把博斯的画解读为一个警告,提醒我们重新思考我们对世界的看法、我们的科学视野和我们的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信