COMPARISON OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF VARIOUS ELECTRICAL MOTORS OPERATING IN A PUMPING UNIT

IF 1.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
V. Goman, S. Oshurbekov, V. Kazakbaev, V. Prakht, V. Dmitrievskii
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF VARIOUS ELECTRICAL MOTORS OPERATING IN A PUMPING UNIT","authors":"V. Goman, S. Oshurbekov, V. Kazakbaev, V. Prakht, V. Dmitrievskii","doi":"10.20998/2074-272x.2020.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Comparative analysis of energy consumption of various types electric motors in fixed speed centrifugal industrial pump applications is carried out. The purpose of the analysis is to choose the most efficient motor in the considered application. It is assumed that hydraulic flow of the pump is adjusted by throttling. The rated power of the pump unit is 2.2 kW. Direct on line motors of various energy efficiency classes from various manufacturers are considered: induction motors with permanent magnets on the rotor of IE4 class and squirrel cage induction motors of IE3 and IE4 classes. Methodology. Assessment of energy consumption of the motors is carried out based on the catalogue data from manufacturers of the pump and the motors. Pump hydraulic equations, interpolation of motor catalogue data and statistical data are also used. Results. The following values have been obtained: annual and daily energy consumption of the motors and electricity cost savings comparing with the least effective motor considered. Practical value. The following practical consideration are presented based on the theoretical results: choosing the motor based only on its IE efficiency class according to IEC 60034-30-1 is not enough to ensure the minimum energy consumption of pump units with variable flow during the load cycle. In addition, the energy consumption may be higher in the case of permanent magnet motors of IE4 class in comparison with induction motors of IE4 or even IE3 class. Therefore, it is necessary to take into account efficiency of the motors at underload and it is needed to calculate the energy consumption during the actual load cycle. It should be noted, that the existing approach based on the Energy Efficiency Index (EEI) calculation does not provide information about absolute values of energy savings and cost savings, in contrast to the described approach. While choosing motors to run in the considered application it is also important to take into account that the motors with permanent magnets on the rotor have significantly higher price and very restricted starting capabilities comparing with induction motors. In addition, the production of rare earth magnets causes a significant environmental damage. References 40, tables 5, figures 6.","PeriodicalId":44198,"journal":{"name":"Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272x.2020.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose. Comparative analysis of energy consumption of various types electric motors in fixed speed centrifugal industrial pump applications is carried out. The purpose of the analysis is to choose the most efficient motor in the considered application. It is assumed that hydraulic flow of the pump is adjusted by throttling. The rated power of the pump unit is 2.2 kW. Direct on line motors of various energy efficiency classes from various manufacturers are considered: induction motors with permanent magnets on the rotor of IE4 class and squirrel cage induction motors of IE3 and IE4 classes. Methodology. Assessment of energy consumption of the motors is carried out based on the catalogue data from manufacturers of the pump and the motors. Pump hydraulic equations, interpolation of motor catalogue data and statistical data are also used. Results. The following values have been obtained: annual and daily energy consumption of the motors and electricity cost savings comparing with the least effective motor considered. Practical value. The following practical consideration are presented based on the theoretical results: choosing the motor based only on its IE efficiency class according to IEC 60034-30-1 is not enough to ensure the minimum energy consumption of pump units with variable flow during the load cycle. In addition, the energy consumption may be higher in the case of permanent magnet motors of IE4 class in comparison with induction motors of IE4 or even IE3 class. Therefore, it is necessary to take into account efficiency of the motors at underload and it is needed to calculate the energy consumption during the actual load cycle. It should be noted, that the existing approach based on the Energy Efficiency Index (EEI) calculation does not provide information about absolute values of energy savings and cost savings, in contrast to the described approach. While choosing motors to run in the considered application it is also important to take into account that the motors with permanent magnets on the rotor have significantly higher price and very restricted starting capabilities comparing with induction motors. In addition, the production of rare earth magnets causes a significant environmental damage. References 40, tables 5, figures 6.
在抽油机中运行的各种电动机的能耗比较
目的。对不同类型电动机在定速离心工业泵应用中的能耗进行了比较分析。分析的目的是在考虑的应用中选择最有效的电机。假设泵的液压流量是通过节流来调节的。水泵机组的额定功率为2.2 kW。考虑了来自不同厂家的各种能效等级的直接在线电机:IE4级转子上带永磁体的感应电机和IE3、IE4级的鼠笼式感应电机。方法。电机的能耗评估是根据泵和电机制造商的目录数据进行的。还使用了泵的水力方程、马达目录数据的插值和统计数据。结果。得到以下值:电机的年和日能耗以及与考虑的最低效电机相比节省的电费。实用价值。根据理论结果,提出了以下实际考虑:仅根据IEC 60034-30-1的IE效率等级选择电机不足以保证变流量泵机组在负荷周期内的最小能耗。此外,IE4级的永磁电机与IE4级甚至IE3级的感应电机相比,能耗可能更高。因此,需要考虑电机在欠载时的效率,并需要计算实际负载周期的能耗。应当指出的是,与上述方法相比,基于能源效率指数(EEI)计算的现有方法不提供关于节约能源和节约成本的绝对值的信息。在选择电机运行时,考虑到与感应电机相比,转子上带有永磁体的电机具有明显更高的价格和非常有限的启动能力,这一点也很重要。此外,稀土磁铁的生产造成了严重的环境破坏。参考文献40,表5,图6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics
Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信