Ultrasonographically guided, compartment-oriented lymph node dissection in the management of papillary thyroid cancer

IF 1.2
G. Sakorafas, A. Koureas, D. Nasikas
{"title":"Ultrasonographically guided, compartment-oriented lymph node dissection in the management of papillary thyroid cancer","authors":"G. Sakorafas, A. Koureas, D. Nasikas","doi":"10.2217/IJE-2016-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lymphatic metastases are common in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) at the time of diagnosis [1]. In the presence of synchronous cervical lymphadenopathy, diagnosed clinically or ultrasonographically, the standard surgical approach has been the modified radical lymph node dissection (MRLND), performed at the time of initial total thyroidectomy. This strategy achieves optimal local control of the disease (thereby minimizing local recurrence rates), improves the efficacy of postoperative radioactive therapy (aiming to eradicate potential residual microscopic disease) and facilitates patient’s monitoring during follow-up by measuring serum thyroglobulin [2]. During recent decades, a modern classification of neck lymph nodes has been widely adopted, based on findings and landmarks from cross-sectional anatomic imaging; this is a useful aid in mapping nodal surgical intervention. This classification system is composed of six major nodal regions (levels or compartments I to VI) and defines a compartment-oriented neck dissection. Sublevel classification is also used when certain zones within the larger levels have independent biological significance [3]. Current evidence suggests specific patterns of lymphatic metastases in PTC. Central (compartment VI) lymph nodes are often the first site for lymphatic metastases from PTC, since this level is considered as the first lymphatic basin draining thyroid parenchyma. The most common lateral lymph node regions harboring metastases are levels III and IV [4,5]. Metastases to levels II and V are more rarely observed [6]. Finally, metastases to level I nodes are extremely rare in PTC [6,7]. Recent advances in imaging allow – with acceptable accuracy – the recognition of the presence of pathological lymph nodes within the different compartments of the neck. Currently, high-resolution ultrasonography (US) is being used extensively in the preoperative assessment of cervical lymph nodes (sensitivity 97%, specificity 93%) [8]. The US characteristics of a suspicious lymph node include increased size, round shape (short axis to long axis ratio ≥0.5), absent echogenic hilum, irregular margins, thickened hypoechoic cortex, intranodal calcifications, cystic necrosis, peripheral or mixed vascularity and increased elasticity score. The accuracy of US in recognizing pathologic neck lymph nodes is higher for the lateral nodal compartments, while US evaluation of central compartment lymph nodes has been proved to be of lower sensitivity in detecting metastatic lymph nodes especially in patients with coexistent chronic","PeriodicalId":42691,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/IJE-2016-0001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/IJE-2016-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lymphatic metastases are common in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) at the time of diagnosis [1]. In the presence of synchronous cervical lymphadenopathy, diagnosed clinically or ultrasonographically, the standard surgical approach has been the modified radical lymph node dissection (MRLND), performed at the time of initial total thyroidectomy. This strategy achieves optimal local control of the disease (thereby minimizing local recurrence rates), improves the efficacy of postoperative radioactive therapy (aiming to eradicate potential residual microscopic disease) and facilitates patient’s monitoring during follow-up by measuring serum thyroglobulin [2]. During recent decades, a modern classification of neck lymph nodes has been widely adopted, based on findings and landmarks from cross-sectional anatomic imaging; this is a useful aid in mapping nodal surgical intervention. This classification system is composed of six major nodal regions (levels or compartments I to VI) and defines a compartment-oriented neck dissection. Sublevel classification is also used when certain zones within the larger levels have independent biological significance [3]. Current evidence suggests specific patterns of lymphatic metastases in PTC. Central (compartment VI) lymph nodes are often the first site for lymphatic metastases from PTC, since this level is considered as the first lymphatic basin draining thyroid parenchyma. The most common lateral lymph node regions harboring metastases are levels III and IV [4,5]. Metastases to levels II and V are more rarely observed [6]. Finally, metastases to level I nodes are extremely rare in PTC [6,7]. Recent advances in imaging allow – with acceptable accuracy – the recognition of the presence of pathological lymph nodes within the different compartments of the neck. Currently, high-resolution ultrasonography (US) is being used extensively in the preoperative assessment of cervical lymph nodes (sensitivity 97%, specificity 93%) [8]. The US characteristics of a suspicious lymph node include increased size, round shape (short axis to long axis ratio ≥0.5), absent echogenic hilum, irregular margins, thickened hypoechoic cortex, intranodal calcifications, cystic necrosis, peripheral or mixed vascularity and increased elasticity score. The accuracy of US in recognizing pathologic neck lymph nodes is higher for the lateral nodal compartments, while US evaluation of central compartment lymph nodes has been proved to be of lower sensitivity in detecting metastatic lymph nodes especially in patients with coexistent chronic
超声引导下室型淋巴结清扫在甲状腺乳头状癌治疗中的应用
淋巴转移在诊断甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)时很常见。在临床或超声诊断为同步性宫颈淋巴结病的情况下,标准的手术方法是改良的根治性淋巴结清扫术(MRLND),在首次全甲状腺切除术时进行。该策略实现了对疾病的最佳局部控制(从而使局部复发率最小化),提高了术后放射治疗的疗效(旨在根除潜在残留的显微疾病),并便于患者在随访中通过测定血清甲状腺球蛋白[2]进行监测。近几十年来,颈部淋巴结的现代分类被广泛采用,基于横断面解剖成像的发现和标志;这对定位淋巴结手术干预是一个有用的帮助。该分类系统由六个主要淋巴结区域(级别或隔室I至VI)组成,并定义了隔室型颈夹层。当较大水平内的某些区域具有独立的生物学意义[3]时,也使用亚水平分类。目前的证据表明PTC有特定的淋巴转移模式。中央(第六室)淋巴结通常是PTC淋巴转移的第一个部位,因为这个淋巴结被认为是第一个引流甲状腺实质的淋巴池。最常见的侧淋巴结转移区为III级和IV级[4,5]。转移到II级和V级的病例更为罕见。最后,转移到I级淋巴结在PTC中极为罕见[6,7]。成像技术的最新进展——以可接受的准确性——允许在颈部不同腔室中识别病理淋巴结的存在。目前,高分辨率超声(US)被广泛应用于颈淋巴结术前评估(灵敏度97%,特异性93%)[8]。可疑淋巴结的超声特征包括体积增大、形状圆形(短轴与长轴比值≥0.5)、门部无回声、边缘不规则、低回声皮层增厚、结内钙化、囊性坏死、外周或混合血管以及弹性评分升高。超声识别病理性颈部淋巴结的准确性在侧结室较高,而超声评估中央室淋巴结已被证明在检测转移性淋巴结时敏感性较低,特别是在共存慢性患者中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Endocrine Oncology is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that helps the clinician to keep up to date with best practice in this fast-moving field. The journal highlights significant advances in basic and translational research, and places them in context for future therapy. The journal presents the latest research findings in diagnosis and management of endocrine cancer, together with authoritative reviews, cutting-edge editorials and perspectives that highlight hot topics and controversy in the field. Independent drug evaluations assess newly approved medications and their role in clinical practice. The journal welcomes the unsolicited submission of article proposals and original research manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信