Meta-analysis of video-assisted versus open parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism

IF 1.2
S. Elwahab, A. Lowery, K. O’Brien, H. Redmond
{"title":"Meta-analysis of video-assisted versus open parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism","authors":"S. Elwahab, A. Lowery, K. O’Brien, H. Redmond","doi":"10.2217/IJE.15.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gold standard treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism was bilateral neck exploration. Video-assisted parathyroidectomy (VAP) facilitated less invasive surgery, however there is lack of evidence comparing it to open parathyroidectomy (OP). A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines to compare them. In three eligible randomized controlled trials (241 patients), VAP operative time (61.7 ± 12 min) was comparable to OP (59.9 ± 6 min), less early postoperative pain, higher cosmetic satisfaction (statistically not significant) and 4% failure rate (none in OP). 25% of VAP converted to OP. Hypocalcaemia was six-times less in VAP (RR 6.4). Careful patient selection and unequivocally positive preoperative localization are critical to the success of this procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis comparing the two techniques.","PeriodicalId":42691,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/IJE.15.22","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/IJE.15.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gold standard treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism was bilateral neck exploration. Video-assisted parathyroidectomy (VAP) facilitated less invasive surgery, however there is lack of evidence comparing it to open parathyroidectomy (OP). A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines to compare them. In three eligible randomized controlled trials (241 patients), VAP operative time (61.7 ± 12 min) was comparable to OP (59.9 ± 6 min), less early postoperative pain, higher cosmetic satisfaction (statistically not significant) and 4% failure rate (none in OP). 25% of VAP converted to OP. Hypocalcaemia was six-times less in VAP (RR 6.4). Careful patient selection and unequivocally positive preoperative localization are critical to the success of this procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis comparing the two techniques.
视频辅助与开放式甲状旁腺切除术治疗原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的meta分析
原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的金标准治疗是双侧颈部探查。视频辅助甲状旁腺切除术(VAP)有助于微创手术,但缺乏证据将其与开放式甲状旁腺切除术(OP)进行比较。根据PRISMA指南进行荟萃分析以比较它们。在3项符合条件的随机对照试验(241例)中,VAP手术时间(61.7±12 min)与OP(59.9±6 min)相当,术后早期疼痛更少,美容满意度更高(统计学上无统计学意义),失败率为4% (OP中无)。25%的VAP转化为op。低钙血症在VAP中减少了6倍(RR 6.4)。仔细的患者选择和明确的术前定位是手术成功的关键。据我们所知,这是第一次比较这两种技术的荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Endocrine Oncology is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that helps the clinician to keep up to date with best practice in this fast-moving field. The journal highlights significant advances in basic and translational research, and places them in context for future therapy. The journal presents the latest research findings in diagnosis and management of endocrine cancer, together with authoritative reviews, cutting-edge editorials and perspectives that highlight hot topics and controversy in the field. Independent drug evaluations assess newly approved medications and their role in clinical practice. The journal welcomes the unsolicited submission of article proposals and original research manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信