{"title":"NO QUICK FIX","authors":"V. Inozemtsev","doi":"10.21557/DSP.46746221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(By Vladislav Inozemtsev, director of the Center for\n Post-Industrial Studies and Berthold Beitz Fellow with the German\n Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). The Moscow Times, May\n 19, 2016, p. 5. Complete text:) This year got off to a bad start.\n Oil prices fell to below $30 per barrel, and a budget deficit of at\n least 5% seemed inevitable. But now Russia’s political elite are\n breathing a sigh of relief. Oil is up to more than $40 per barrel,\n and experts are predicting that prices are more likely to continue\n climbing than to collapse, as they did in winter. ... Of course, oil price trends cannot be forecast with any\n certainty. But financial officials recently stated that if oil\n remains between $40 and $50 per barrel, the economy will enter a\n \"new reality.\" What does that mean? ... It refers to a course toward moderate belt-tightening - higher\n taxes and stricter collection of them - as well as limiting imports\n through protectionist measures. Government propaganda must be\n stepped up to convince the Russian people that scheming foreigners\n are the cause of their problems, not their leaders’ failed economic\n policy. ... This is simply \"milking the economy.\" Oil and gas revenues will\n fall. They totaled 7.43 trillion rubles in 2014, dropped to 5.86\n trillion rubles in 2015 and could fall to 4.5 trillion rubles in\n 2016. Therefore, the authorities will have to cut project\n investment, reduce funding to the regions and scale back financial\n incentives for state employees. ... That will lead to further decline in an economy kept afloat by\n government investment and purchases. Import volumes have dropped to\n half of their 2014 level, which means a decline in value-added tax\n revenues from the sale of those goods. ... The additional pressure that places on business, coupled with\n the reduction in state orders and the shrinking incomes of\n government employees, will lead to production declines. The\n authorities will use Central Bank emissions and quasi-emissions to\n limit spending from the government’s reserve fund, but that will\n not halt the recession. The 1.4% drop in gross domestic product\n during the first quarter of 2016 will only fuel further\n declines. ... Economic recovery is unlikely in 2017; in fact, I expect Russia\n will see no economic growth even if oil prices rise to as much as\n $65 to $70 per barrel. ... Even if leaders manage to avoid cutting salaries for state\n employees and save money by eliminating the most useless\n expenditures, a general population frightened by the crisis and\n burdened by high interest rates is unlikely to increase personal\n spending. Higher oil prices will strengthen the ruble. That will\n result in lower profits ... for major raw materials corporations, thus reducing ruble\n revenues to the federal budget. Most businesspeople will continue\n to expect further stagnation and will be unlikely to invest in new\n projects. ... If oil prices rise, the authorities will readopt their 2010\n attitude. At that time, they expected an imminent end to the crisis\n and immediately gave up on liberalizing business conditions or\n implementing economic structural reforms. Russia will enter a\n period of classic stagnation, marked by a lack of incentive for\n change. ... This leads to a simple and rather pessimistic conclusion: Russia\n is trapped by its dependence on commodity markets. ... Russia has no realistic plan for modernization, particularly\n given its isolation and lack of potential economic partners.\n Regardless of how oil prices and the ruble finally reach\n equilibrium, no qualitative change will result. ... There are only two scenarios by which Russia could see renewed\n economic growth in the coming years. ... The first requires oil prices to continuously rise, as they\n previously did throughout President Vladimir Putin’s terms in\n office. ... However, data from the past decades indicates that oil prices\n must rise by 15% to 20% annually for economic growth to resume (all\n [other] things being equal). In practical terms, that means oil\n prices must reach approximately $80 per barrel by 2018 and no less\n than $110 per barrel by 2020. ... Such a scenario might provide economic growth of 2% to 4% per\n annum and return the Russian economy to 2008 levels by 2019 - 2020.\n However, that scenario is unlikely: The current price war and the\n sharp increase in supply from new forms of energy such as shale oil\n and biofuels could effectively cap prices at $60 per barrel. ... There is a second option. Rather than implementing the necessary\n structural reforms, leaders could make it easier to do business in\n Russia by reinstating relatively free trade, returning a\n significant volume of land in central Russia to the marketplace,\n waiving taxes for new businesses, creating potent guarantees for\n foreign investment and launching mechanisms for stimulating\n demand. ... The government could take the position that the creation of jobs\n and economic growth are temporarily more important than collecting\n taxes, and that it is better to let people earn money on their own\n than to put them on the government payroll.","PeriodicalId":76676,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association","volume":"68 1","pages":"12-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21557/DSP.46746221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
(By Vladislav Inozemtsev, director of the Center for
Post-Industrial Studies and Berthold Beitz Fellow with the German
Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). The Moscow Times, May
19, 2016, p. 5. Complete text:) This year got off to a bad start.
Oil prices fell to below $30 per barrel, and a budget deficit of at
least 5% seemed inevitable. But now Russia’s political elite are
breathing a sigh of relief. Oil is up to more than $40 per barrel,
and experts are predicting that prices are more likely to continue
climbing than to collapse, as they did in winter. ... Of course, oil price trends cannot be forecast with any
certainty. But financial officials recently stated that if oil
remains between $40 and $50 per barrel, the economy will enter a
"new reality." What does that mean? ... It refers to a course toward moderate belt-tightening - higher
taxes and stricter collection of them - as well as limiting imports
through protectionist measures. Government propaganda must be
stepped up to convince the Russian people that scheming foreigners
are the cause of their problems, not their leaders’ failed economic
policy. ... This is simply "milking the economy." Oil and gas revenues will
fall. They totaled 7.43 trillion rubles in 2014, dropped to 5.86
trillion rubles in 2015 and could fall to 4.5 trillion rubles in
2016. Therefore, the authorities will have to cut project
investment, reduce funding to the regions and scale back financial
incentives for state employees. ... That will lead to further decline in an economy kept afloat by
government investment and purchases. Import volumes have dropped to
half of their 2014 level, which means a decline in value-added tax
revenues from the sale of those goods. ... The additional pressure that places on business, coupled with
the reduction in state orders and the shrinking incomes of
government employees, will lead to production declines. The
authorities will use Central Bank emissions and quasi-emissions to
limit spending from the government’s reserve fund, but that will
not halt the recession. The 1.4% drop in gross domestic product
during the first quarter of 2016 will only fuel further
declines. ... Economic recovery is unlikely in 2017; in fact, I expect Russia
will see no economic growth even if oil prices rise to as much as
$65 to $70 per barrel. ... Even if leaders manage to avoid cutting salaries for state
employees and save money by eliminating the most useless
expenditures, a general population frightened by the crisis and
burdened by high interest rates is unlikely to increase personal
spending. Higher oil prices will strengthen the ruble. That will
result in lower profits ... for major raw materials corporations, thus reducing ruble
revenues to the federal budget. Most businesspeople will continue
to expect further stagnation and will be unlikely to invest in new
projects. ... If oil prices rise, the authorities will readopt their 2010
attitude. At that time, they expected an imminent end to the crisis
and immediately gave up on liberalizing business conditions or
implementing economic structural reforms. Russia will enter a
period of classic stagnation, marked by a lack of incentive for
change. ... This leads to a simple and rather pessimistic conclusion: Russia
is trapped by its dependence on commodity markets. ... Russia has no realistic plan for modernization, particularly
given its isolation and lack of potential economic partners.
Regardless of how oil prices and the ruble finally reach
equilibrium, no qualitative change will result. ... There are only two scenarios by which Russia could see renewed
economic growth in the coming years. ... The first requires oil prices to continuously rise, as they
previously did throughout President Vladimir Putin’s terms in
office. ... However, data from the past decades indicates that oil prices
must rise by 15% to 20% annually for economic growth to resume (all
[other] things being equal). In practical terms, that means oil
prices must reach approximately $80 per barrel by 2018 and no less
than $110 per barrel by 2020. ... Such a scenario might provide economic growth of 2% to 4% per
annum and return the Russian economy to 2008 levels by 2019 - 2020.
However, that scenario is unlikely: The current price war and the
sharp increase in supply from new forms of energy such as shale oil
and biofuels could effectively cap prices at $60 per barrel. ... There is a second option. Rather than implementing the necessary
structural reforms, leaders could make it easier to do business in
Russia by reinstating relatively free trade, returning a
significant volume of land in central Russia to the marketplace,
waiving taxes for new businesses, creating potent guarantees for
foreign investment and launching mechanisms for stimulating
demand. ... The government could take the position that the creation of jobs
and economic growth are temporarily more important than collecting
taxes, and that it is better to let people earn money on their own
than to put them on the government payroll.