Proposing a Transactional Approach to Civil Forfeiture Reform

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
Michael van den Berg
{"title":"Proposing a Transactional Approach to Civil Forfeiture Reform","authors":"Michael van den Berg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2572022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This student comment provides a new lens through which to understand the controversial practice of Civil Forfeiture. The comment divides forfeited items into Low, Mid, and High Value Chattel (along with Real Property, which is not discussed), and suggests solutions for protecting Low and Mid Value Chattel, while encouraging the pursuit of High Value Chattel forfeiture. Specifically, the comment proposes treating forfeiture as a transaction in the Coasean/Calabresian paradigm, limiting externalities and increasing transaction costs to adjust the \"market\" for forfeiture.","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.2572022","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2572022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This student comment provides a new lens through which to understand the controversial practice of Civil Forfeiture. The comment divides forfeited items into Low, Mid, and High Value Chattel (along with Real Property, which is not discussed), and suggests solutions for protecting Low and Mid Value Chattel, while encouraging the pursuit of High Value Chattel forfeiture. Specifically, the comment proposes treating forfeiture as a transaction in the Coasean/Calabresian paradigm, limiting externalities and increasing transaction costs to adjust the "market" for forfeiture.
提出一种交易性的民事没收改革方法
这一学生评论为理解有争议的民事没收实践提供了一个新的视角。该评论将没收的物品分为低价值、中价值和高价值的动产(以及未讨论的不动产),并提出了保护低价值和中价值动产的解决方案,同时鼓励追求高价值的动产没收。具体而言,该评论建议将没收作为Coasean/Calabresian范式中的交易,限制外部性并增加交易成本以调整没收的“市场”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信